[jira] Resolved: (JDO-369) Completeness test doesn't clean up instances of persistent interfaces

2006-04-20 Thread Michael Bouschen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-369?page=all ] Michael Bouschen resolved JDO-369: -- Resolution: Fixed Checked in the patch into the trunk (revision 395567) and the 2.0 branch (revision 395568). > Completeness test doesn't clean up insta

[jira] Updated: (JDO-370) Valid query seems invalid in SetterReplacePreviousValues

2006-04-20 Thread Michael Bouschen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-370?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-370: - Attachment: JDO-370.patch Good catch! I agree, the second query is invalid. It is supposed to be testing the replacement of the query filter, so it does not nee

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-370) Valid query seems invalid in SetterReplacePreviousValues

2006-04-20 Thread Michael Bouschen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-370?page=all ] Michael Bouschen reassigned JDO-370: Assign To: Michael Bouschen > Valid query seems invalid in SetterReplacePreviousValues > > >

Re: [Fwd: last issue with completeness test]

2006-04-20 Thread Jörg von Frantzius
Hello Craig, I think that if we have includeSubclasses==true that the WHERE clause generated by JPOX will OR all possible values of the discriminator column. Won't that also be sped up by an index on the discriminator column? Regards, Jörg Craig L Russell schrieb: Hi Jörg, Just to be

[jira] Commented: (JDO-370) Valid query seems invalid in SetterReplacePreviousValues

2006-04-20 Thread Craig Russell (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-370?page=comments#action_12375360 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-370: --- The patch looks good. I'd have to look more carefully, but generally by the specification, it's not illegal to declare parameters that are

[jira] Commented: (JDO-370) Valid query seems invalid in SetterReplacePreviousValues

2006-04-20 Thread Ilan Kirsh (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-370?page=comments#action_12375362 ] Ilan Kirsh commented on JDO-370: Thanks. The patch works well - I just passed this test case now. > Valid query seems invalid in SetterReplacePreviousValues > ---

[jira] Updated: (JDO-365) Create web page with instructions for creating a release

2006-04-20 Thread Michelle Caisse (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-365?page=all ] Michelle Caisse updated JDO-365: Attachment: HowToReleaseJDOmc.txt I have made comments on HowToReleaseJDO.txt in-line in the attachment. > Create web page with instructions for creating a relea

JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Apr 21, 9 am PST

2006-04-20 Thread Michelle Caisse
Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, April 21 at 9 am PST to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. Dial-in numbers are: 866 230-6968 294-0479# International: +1 865 544-7856 Agenda: 1. The last issue (Erik, Craig) 2. Web site tasks (Michelle, Craig) 3. Steps to final release (Craig) 4

[jira] Updated: (JDO-370) Valid query seems invalid in SetterReplacePreviousValues

2006-04-20 Thread Michael Bouschen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-370?page=all ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-370: - Fix Version: JDO 2 final Version: JDO 2 rc1 > Valid query seems invalid in SetterReplacePreviousValues >

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-370) Valid query seems invalid in SetterReplacePreviousValues

2006-04-20 Thread Michael Bouschen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-370?page=all ] Michael Bouschen resolved JDO-370: -- Resolution: Fixed I checked in the patch into the 2.0 branch (revision 395620) and into the trunk (revision 395621). > Valid query seems invalid in Sett

Revised agenda, JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Apr 21, 9 am PST

2006-04-20 Thread Michelle Caisse
[Take 2] Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, April 21 at 9 am PST to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. Dial-in numbers are: 866 230-6968 294-0479# International: +1 865 544-7856 Agenda: 1. The last issue (Erik, Craig) 2. Summer of Code (Craig) 3. Other issues (any and all) Acti