Re: The Future of JDO

2006-10-05 Thread David Jordan
One other thing I forgot to mention last night... Just in the last two weeks there was some discussion among the members of the local Java User's Group. A few people were complaining about how difficult and frustrating it was using Hibernate, due to some of its limitations. They were

Re: The Future of JDO

2006-10-05 Thread Erik Bengtson
The fact that JPA has not really had much impact (that is the perception out there, I don't know the reality, but in the market it is perception that matters) does give JDO a new opportunity to rise up and be reconsidered. This is very important point, but maybe optimistic. I would say

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-345) MethodsAndObjectConstructionNotSupported (A14.6.2-8) should allow getX()

2006-10-05 Thread Michael Bouschen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-345?page=all ] Michael Bouschen resolved JDO-345. -- Resolution: Fixed Cleaned up the imports and checked in the patch into the trunk and into branch 2.0.1 (see revision 453263).

[jira] Updated: (JDO-417) Make JDO jar an OSGI bundle

2006-10-05 Thread Craig Russell (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-417?page=all ] Craig Russell updated JDO-417: -- Attachment: JDO-417.patch Please review this patch. I've anticipated the release that this will be shipped with, 2.1. I've removed references to import of the xa

Re: The Future of JDO

2006-10-05 Thread Geoff hendrey
Hi All, It's been a while since I've posted. I've taken down the JDOMax website, and I'm now focusing my efforts on Shades. http://sourceforge.net/projects/shadesdb I continue to think that JDO is a leap forward, and I continue to share my great experiences as both a user of JDO and an

Re: The Future of JDO

2006-10-05 Thread Bruce Snyder
What about trying to work with the OpenJPA (http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/) team to develop an integration strategy? After all, both projects are at the ASF and there is no harm in discussing it. Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]5R\F)R=6-E+G-N61ED\!G;6%I;\YC;VT* );'

[jira] Commented: (JDO-430) JPOX fails new test CompletenessTestList, configuration companyListWithoutJoin

2006-10-05 Thread Michelle Caisse (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-430?page=comments#action_12440199 ] Michelle Caisse commented on JDO-430: - In this test case order information will be contained in a database column only, not in a field of the class. JPOX fails

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-421) Enhancer log contains ERRORs, but output appears to be fine

2006-10-05 Thread Michelle Caisse (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-421?page=all ] Michelle Caisse resolved JDO-421. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed with revision: 453315 Verified that with the current JPOX, these patches, and JDK 1.5, there are no error messages in the enhancer

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-193) Need new test cases for Map and List where there is no join table; the key is a field of the value type or the value is a field of the key type

2006-10-05 Thread Michelle Caisse (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-193?page=all ] Michelle Caisse resolved JDO-193. - Resolution: Fixed JDO-430 is now tracking the remaining issues on this case. Need new test cases for Map and List where there is no join table; the key is a

[jira] Commented: (JDO-430) JPOX fails new test CompletenessTestList, configuration companyListWithoutJoin

2006-10-05 Thread Michelle Caisse (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-430?page=comments#action_12440262 ] Michelle Caisse commented on JDO-430: - I checked in changes to the .orm and .sql files (revision: 453382). There are two issues: (1) When using the mapped-by

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-430) JPOX fails new test CompletenessTestList, configuration companyListWithoutJoin

2006-10-05 Thread Michelle Caisse (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-430?page=all ] Michelle Caisse reassigned JDO-430: --- Assignee: Andy Jefferson (was: Michelle Caisse) JPOX fails new test CompletenessTestList, configuration companyListWithoutJoin

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-373) Comment error in OptimisticFailure

2006-10-05 Thread Michelle Caisse (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-373?page=all ] Michelle Caisse resolved JDO-373. - Resolution: Fixed revision: 453390 Comment error in OptimisticFailure -- Key: JDO-373

Re: The Future of JDO

2006-10-05 Thread David Jordan
I am not at all opposed to what Andy has suggested. I guess the big question is whether JDO offers enough beyond JPA that makes this effort worthwhile, versus everyone just doing JPA. On Oct 5, 2006, at 7:17 PM, Ilan Kirsh wrote: My personal feeling after reading the JPA spec and two

Re: The Future of JDO

2006-10-05 Thread Ilan Kirsh
I found now an interesting poll at http://www.java.net/pub/pq/122. The results should be taken suspiciously of course, but it seems that JDO still has some hope as it is. However, probably by extending JPA as Hibernate and TopLink do it has much better chances. I agree that the big question is

JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Oct 6, 9 am PDT

2006-10-05 Thread Michelle Caisse
Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, October 6 at 9 am PDT to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. Dial-in numbers are: 866 230-6968 294-0479# International: +1 865 544-7856 Agenda: 1. Test challenge issues and status 2. Reflection based implementations 3. JDOQL subquery