Hi Christian,
This smells like the userObject property/map allowable on the PM that
was present in JDO 1.0 and expanded in JDO 2.0. The only difference, if
I understand what you're saying, is that you would be able to get a PM
from a PMF by userObject, yes?
If so, this would require a method ove
Hi JDO friends !
Following the discussion about named PMF,
i would like to suggest to add also a name to PM.
I think there are cases where it would be helpful to have a named PM.
For Example:
A named PM allows to track its PM / TXN via logging up to the Database
Server ( assuming the Database S
On Feb 28, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Matthew Adams wrote:
Inline...
Call it what you want -- I only proposed these names. I
wouldn't call
it persistence.xml, as the contents are not the same as the
JPA-specified content. If the persistence.xml is found, its
contents
are of course interpretable
Inline...
>> Call it what you want -- I only proposed these names. I
>wouldn't call
>> it persistence.xml, as the contents are not the same as the
>> JPA-specified content. If the persistence.xml is found, its contents
>> are of course interpretable by the JDO implementation
>according to our
