[jira] Updated: (JDO-472) Cannot use JDO 2 xsd for XML validation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-472: - Fix Version/s: (was: JDO 2 final) JDO 2 maintenance release 1 Assigne

JDO metadata: XSD changes

After discussing this issue, there don't appear to be any objections. Go ahead with the changes. Craig On Apr 25, 2007, at 1:13 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi, as Craig recently pointed out the JDO XSD files are not correct and cause failures when using the feature schema-full-checking dur

[jira] Commented: (JDO-416) jdo2-api Maven2 POM is incorrect

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12496964 ] Matthew T. Adams commented on JDO-416: -- POM in central repo looks good -- going to close issue. > jdo2-api Maven2

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, May 18 , 9 am PDT

Attendees: Michelle Caisse, Matthew Adams, Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. Review steps toward releasing JDO 2.1 Looks like we're ready to branch after http://issues.apache.org/jira/ browse/JDO-472 is checked in. This will split the api20 project into api2-legacy and api2 (with

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-416) jdo2-api Maven2 POM is incorrect

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matthew T. Adams resolved JDO-416. -- Resolution: Fixed > jdo2-api Maven2 POM is incorrect > > >

[jira] Commented: (JDO-437) Add test for detachment when the instances are of a class that is not detachable.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497011 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-437: --- Suggest new name for unDetached variable. Consider removing unused imports. Ship

[jira] Reopened: (JDO-397) Locale instances are shared by different PMs (when in use as FCO)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michelle Caisse reopened JDO-397: - Assignee: Craig Russell (was: Michelle Caisse) Undid previous commit. The spec will be changed to

[jira] Commented: (JDO-433) setUp() is not declared final in org.apache.jdo.tck.JDO_Test

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497099 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-433: --- Looks good. Just one comment. I don't think we need the localSetUp method to cal