broken tests in TCK testsuite

2009-07-30 Thread CRomberg
Hi all, I hope this is the right list to report broken tests in the TCK testsuite, I'm referring to TCK 2.0, ignore my post if these issues are resolved meanwhile: The following tests are broken, because they rely on a no-args ctor requirement: org.apache.jdo.tck.api.persistencemanagerfactory

Fw: broken tests in TCK testsuite

2009-07-30 Thread CRomberg
I forgot to include the following two: org.apache.jdo.tck.api.persistencemanagerfactory.GetPersistenceManager org.apache.jdo.tck.api.persistencemanagerfactory.GetPersistenceManagerForUser Christian - Forwarded by Christian Romberg/VERSANT on 30.07.2009 14:13 - From: Christian Romberg/VE

Re: broken tests in TCK testsuite

2009-07-30 Thread Andy Jefferson
> I hope this is the right list to report broken tests in the TCK testsuite, > I'm referring to TCK 2.0, ignore my post if these issues are resolved > meanwhile: > The following tests are broken, because they rely on a no-args ctor Hi Christian, Maybe I'm missing something but if I look at spec (

Re: broken tests in TCK testsuite

2009-07-30 Thread CRomberg
Hi Andy, I've checked 2.0, it's not in there, so it must have been introduced post-2.0. However I still have concerns with this approach: Normally PMFs are constructed via the static helper method contained in the vendor's PMF implementation. This introduces an alternative code path, which e.g.

Re: broken tests in TCK testsuite

2009-07-30 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Christian, From 11.1 of the specification: The PersistenceManagerFactory implementation class must implement a no- args constructor. This allows the standard Java 6 service discovery implementation to create a factory instance upon which the getPersistenceManagerFactory methods can be in

NO JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, July 31

2009-07-30 Thread Michelle Caisse
Hi, We will NOT have our regular meeting this week. Back next week. -- Michelle