This vote has succeeded.
Voting +1:
Craig L Russell (binding)
Andy Jefferson (binding)
Michael Bouschen (binding)
Michelle Caisse (binding)
Matthew Adams
Voting -1 or 0: none
Note that the JCP Executive Committee is reviewing JDO 3.0 Maintenance
Review, with an expected completion date of Ju
On Jul 14, 2010, at 7:53 AM, Matthew Adams wrote:
Seems like a good idea. Could foreign keys be considered the same
as basic
fields for the purposes of the default fetch group? That is,
fetched by
default unless the user says don't fetch?
That's where I would start. We need to decide wh
Seems like a good idea. Could foreign keys be considered the same as basic
fields for the purposes of the default fetch group? That is, fetched by
default unless the user says don't fetch?
I assume that if an object is loaded using a fetch group that doesn't
include foreign keys and the foreign
Post from 25 August 2008 by Craig.
> http://openjpa.apache.org/docs/latest/manual/manual.html#ref_guide_fetch_im
> pl says that "Even when a direct relation is not eagerly fetched,
> OpenJPA selects the foreign key columns and caches the values. This way
> when you do traverse the relation, OpenJP
