[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12933958#action_12933958
]
Craig L Russell commented on JDO-669:
-
It's a test case bug. It's not permitted to access
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Craig L Russell updated JDO-669:
Component/s: (was: specification)
The specification does not need to be changed.
> TCK : Relation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Craig L Russell reassigned JDO-669:
---
Assignee: Craig L Russell
> TCK : RelationshipManyToManyAllRelationships.testDeleteFromMappedSid
TCK : RelationshipManyToManyAllRelationships.testDeleteFromMappedSide - problem
with check
--
Key: JDO-669
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-669
Proj
Attendees: Michelle Caisse, Craig Russell
Agenda:
1. Maven2 upgrade. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-647
Making progress but not done yet. AI Michelle check in the partial
code since it doesn't impact running the tck under maven 1.
2. Provision of a typesafe refactor-friendly que
Hi Andy,
Regardless of the outcome, this is an issue that we should track.
IIUC, either the tck test or the spec will have to change. It might be
easier to track with a JIRA.
Thanks,
Craig
On Nov 19, 2010, at 6:54 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote:
Hi,
whilst this test passes with current DataN
Hi,
whilst this test passes with current DataNucleus, I was in the process of
extending its support for managed relationships, and now get this test to fail
which provokes this question :-
pm.deletePersistent(proj1);
pm.flush();
deferredAssertTrue(!emp1.getProjects().contains(proj1),
ASSERT
