Retire JDO Expert Group mail list

Hi, The JDO expert group mail list is being retired due to the transfer of assets from Sun to Oracle. Does anyone see a need to maintain a separate JDO expert group list? I'd prefer to have subscribers to jdo-experts-ext to simply subscribe to jdo-dev instead. Any other ideas? Thanks,

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-607) Require no-args constructor for PMF implementations and add static methods to PMF interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13185730#comment-13185730 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-607: - The suggested approach is fundamentally broken. A

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Jan 13, 9 am Pacific Time

Attendees: Matthew Adams, Michael Bouschen, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. JDO 3.0.1 release status The bundle that Matthew uploaded was rejected by maven central but no diagnostic information was sent back. reposit...@apache.org might help. 2. News on new feature idea http://osdir.com/ml/jdo-dev

[jira] [Resolved] (JDO-64) Enhancer test cases must be adapted to JDO2.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell resolved JDO-64. Resolution: Fixed The classes were removed from trunk. > Enhancer test cases must be a

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-702) Support for specification of embedded inherited objects

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13185696#comment-13185696 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-702: - Not clear that we need to update the company model