[jira] [Updated] (JDO-650) Support for conditional operator ? : in JDOQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-650: - Fix Version/s: (was: JDO 3 maintenance release 1 (3.1)) JDO 3 maintenance rele

Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Feb 03, 9 am Pacific Time

Attendees: Michelle Caisse, Michael Bouschen, Matthew Adams, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. JDO 3.0.1 release status Retried uploading the bundle. Validated all artifacts. MVNCENTRAL-160 is tracking the issue. I could verify the artifacts. [CraigRussell-3:~/Downloads] clr% gpg --verify jdo

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-703) Support datastore multitenancy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13199927#comment-13199927 ] Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-703: DataNucleus already has support for this style of fe

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-650) Support for conditional operator ? : in JDOQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13199921#comment-13199921 ] Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-650: No support for this JDO syntax present. There is obv

[jira] [Resolved] (JDO-607) Require no-args constructor for PMF implementations and add static methods to PMF interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell resolved JDO-607. - Resolution: Not A Problem This approach doesn't work. See JDO-556 instead. > Requir

[jira] [Updated] (JDO-702) Support for specification of embedded inherited objects

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Bouschen updated JDO-702: - Affects Version/s: JDO 3 (3.0) Fix Version/s: JDO 3 maintenance release 1 (3.1) > Suppor

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-650) Support for conditional operator ? : in JDOQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13199902#comment-13199902 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-650: - Is there any support for this in DataNucleus? If n

Re: Test

Test confirmed Tim Gallagher Clinical & Economic Research 3M Health Information Systems 5000 Buttercup Drive Castle Rock, CO 80109 Phone: (303) 814-3867 From: Michael Bouschen To: Date: 02/03/2012 10:20 AM Subject: Test Test email -- *Michael Bouschen* *Prokurist* akquinet tech@spree

Test

Test email -- *Michael Bouschen* *Prokurist* akquinet tech@spree GmbH Bülowstr. 66, D-10783 Berlin Fon: +49 30 235 520-33 Fax: +49 30 217 520-12 Email: michael.bousc...@akquinet.de Web: www.akquinet.de akquinet tech@spree GmbH, Berlin Geschäftsführung: Martin Weber,

Fwd: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Feb 03, 9 am Pacific Time

Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, February 03 at 9 am Pacific Time to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. Dial-in numbers are: US Toll free: 866 682-4770 Germany Frankfurt 06916106 Germany Toll free: 08006648515 (Other countries by request) To place the call: 1. Call

[jira] [Created] (JDO-703) Support datastore multitenancy

Support datastore multitenancy -- Key: JDO-703 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-703 Project: JDO Issue Type: New Feature Components: api, tck Affects Versions: JDO 3 maintenance release