[jira] [Commented] (JDO-617) JDOQL : Bulk Update and Delete Operations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13248893#comment-13248893 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-617: - I don't see the value in adding update by query to

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-706) No enhancer log output with maven 2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234145#comment-13234145 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-706: - Can you try creating a class loader that has the

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-706) No enhancer log output with maven 2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233182#comment-13233182 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-706: - From reading the log4j code, there are two places

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-708) Create JIRA component entry for exectck parent-pom modules

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13226256#comment-13226256 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-708: - It's not obvious to me that exectck needs a

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-650) Support for conditional operator ? : in JDOQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13199902#comment-13199902 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-650: - Is there any support for this in DataNucleus? If

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-667) Extend PersistenceManageFactory to return all known entity classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13194867#comment-13194867 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-667: - Is there a patch for this issue?

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-702) Support for specification of embedded inherited objects

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13185696#comment-13185696 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-702: - Not clear that we need to update the company

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-607) Require no-args constructor for PMF implementations and add static methods to PMF interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13185730#comment-13185730 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-607: - The suggested approach is fundamentally broken. A

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-702) Support for specification of embedded inherited objects

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13181445#comment-13181445 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-702: - So all we need is a tck test case? I'll take care

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-702) Support for specification of embedded inherited objects

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13161734#comment-13161734 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-702: - Sounds good. Support for

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-696) Throw on unrecognized javax.jdo options

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13149446#comment-13149446 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-696: - The code now requires case-insensitive properties,

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-696) Throw on unrecognized javax.jdo options

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148635#comment-13148635 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-696: - Since we're trying to avoid type kinds of errors,

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-699) Archive unmaintained modules

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13138570#comment-13138570 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-699: - I agree that keeping unmaintained sub-projects in

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-695) Fix for JDO-693, JDO-688 PMFMapMapTest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13122555#comment-13122555 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-695: - I tried to apply the patch. patching file

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-688) javax.jdo.EnhancerTest#testClasspathJar() fails on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13122923#comment-13122923 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-688: - Looks good.

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-693) Constant string javax.jdo.option.TransactionType not defined in javax.jdo.Constants

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13122926#comment-13122926 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-693: - The patch for TransactionType looks good.

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-684) Fix OSGi Export-Package entries in JDO 3.0 manifest to include version

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13122408#comment-13122408 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-684: - Looks good. Just one minor question. The patch