If the instances in cache are not serializable, then an exception gets thrown
at runtime when the instance in cache tries to serialize.
(of course a PM might be super smart and might know how to serialize a
PersistanceCapable instanc. Heck, it already knows how to map a PC to a
database).
:-)
How do we deal with the fact that any components stored in a Page state
(wicket/tapestry lingo) need to be serializable?
In the case of wicket, Page is serialized all the time, not just when
clustering is applies. The pages are serialized and deserialized in order to
minimize the memory
Hi All,
It's been a while since I've posted. I've taken down the JDOMax website, and
I'm now focusing my efforts on Shades.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/shadesdb
I continue to think that JDO is a leap forward, and I continue to share my
great experiences as both a user of JDO and an
Are we sure we want to mandate the xsi:schemaLocation?
Often times you want to point to a local copy of the
schema. Once you've done a JAXB binding, it's not
necessary at all for the schemaLocation to be
specified. One thing I've run into with specifying the
schemaLocation as http://yadayadayada
My vote is uninformed since I have been unable to
participate in the TCK process. But I give my yes
vote.
--- Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Javadogs,
I'd like to propose that we release jdo2 beta based
on the current
code in the svn repository and a few minor changes.
1.
+1
--- Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Javadogs,
I'd like to tally the vote on this issue by close of
business
Thursday 8-Dec-2005.
This issue was renamed to highlight the interface
change.
Please vote to adopt this proposal or offer a reason
to reject it.
It's the
Issue 88 is resolved via some changed language in the
spec, no?
-geoff
--- Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Javadogs,
We're making great progress on the issues list.
Craig

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638
Well, I just bit the bullet and built in code to
serialize the objects when they are not PC's. Now that
we have a standardized mapping, this sort of ambiguity
will be harder to slide by, because the or-mapping
will be part of the test suite (right?).
-geoff
--- Craig Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Andy Jefferson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Craig,
thanks for your reply and your insights.
Example 1 : Collection of BigDecimal
1. Basic collection
field name=myfield
collection
element-type=java.math.BigDecimal/
join/
/field
This creates 2 tables - 1 for
AMEN
The jdoDetachedState is an Object[ ] that consists
of:
{
Object objectId,
Object version,
BitSet loadedFields,
BitSet modifiedFields
}
/AMEN
I also think it would be a nice improvement to make
loadedFields and modifiedFields accessible and useable
for non-detached classes. It's in
Department.hashCode method is using a persistent field
to compute the value of the hashcode, in TCK11. Note
that in the Sun version of the TCK, which JDOMax
passes, hashCode is NOT overidden for Department.
I think it is wrong to override hashCode and equals
for any class using datastore
Unfortunately I can't join in tomorrow.
--- Michelle Caisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We will have our regular meeting Friday, May 20 at 9
am PST to discuss
JDO TCK issues and status.
Dial-in numbers are:
866 230-6968 294-0479#
International: +1 865 544-7856
Agenda:
Test
to
run a shorter set, I
keep a copy of allTests.list and delete entries to
run only the set that
I want. Do we need to have an exclude feature like
JavaTest?
-- Michelle
Geoff hendrey wrote:
OK, so am am able to run the tck11 against JDOMax.
There are two files in test/conf that seem
building tck11, ...
Hope this helps,
Michelle
Geoff hendrey wrote:
I'm trying to run the tck11 enhance goal.
There is a dependency on jdo-btree-SNAPSHOT.
When I try to execute the three CVS commands to
get
the code, I succesfully get
org\netbeans\mdr\persistence package
These are notes I gathered from the last version of
the TCK I ran (not what I just got from Apache, but
maybe some of the problems remain, we'll see). These
are notes on the test source code itself. I'm not
looking for any feedback on this, jut thought I would
toss it out there.
Package:
build btree
before building tck11, ...
Hope this helps,
Michelle
Geoff hendrey wrote:
I'm trying to run the tck11 enhance goal.
There is a dependency on jdo-btree-SNAPSHOT.
When I try to execute the three CVS commands to get
the code, I succesfully get
org\netbeans\mdr
that we need to add information to
README.txt regarding
dependencies in building the subprojects, e.g. you
must build btree
before building tck11, ...
Hope this helps,
Michelle
Geoff hendrey wrote:
I'm trying to run the tck11 enhance goal.
There is a dependency on jdo-btree
dependencies in building the subprojects, e.g. you
must build btree
before building tck11, ...
Hope this helps,
Michelle
Geoff hendrey wrote:
I'm trying to run the tck11 enhance goal.
There is a dependency on jdo-btree-SNAPSHOT.
When I try to execute the three CVS commands
I'm trying to run the tck11 enhance goal.
There is a dependency on jdo-btree-SNAPSHOT.
When I try to execute the three CVS commands to get
the code, I succesfully get
org\netbeans\mdr\persistence package, but the
btreeimpl subpackage appears to not exist. If I create
the btreeimpl subpackage by
are hamstrung
from being able to say primary-key in an XML format
for ORM??
-geoff
--- Craig Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Geoff,
On Feb 12, 2005, at 8:22 PM, Geoff hendrey wrote:
I think we've reached agreement on another issue
as
well. That is, changing datastore-identity to
primary
20 matches
Mail list logo
