Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2007, at 12:24 AM, Guido Anzuoni wrote:
>
>> Craig L Russell Sun.COM> writes:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Guido,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your comments.
>>>
>>> On Feb 12, 2007, at 4:39 AM, Guido Anzuoni wrote:
>>>
when
it associate the PM with the transaction, but ther
On Feb 21, 2007, at 12:24 AM, Guido Anzuoni wrote:
Craig L Russell Sun.COM> writes:
Hi Guido,
Thanks for your comments.
On Feb 12, 2007, at 4:39 AM, Guido Anzuoni wrote:
when
it associate the PM with the transaction, but there could be
ordering issues
with other Synchronization objects
Craig L Russell Sun.COM> writes:
>
> Hi Guido,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> On Feb 12, 2007, at 4:39 AM, Guido Anzuoni wrote:
>
> > It is not clear when the real PersistenceManager will get closed.
> > In a RESOURCE_LOCAL scenario close on the proxy could be propagated
> > to the
> > r
Hi Guido,
Thanks for your comments.
On Feb 12, 2007, at 4:39 AM, Guido Anzuoni wrote:
It is not clear when the real PersistenceManager will get closed.
In a RESOURCE_LOCAL scenario close on the proxy could be propagated
to the
real PM before/after
deassociation in the Thread-local
Yes, th
It is not clear when the real PersistenceManager will get closed.
In a RESOURCE_LOCAL scenario close on the proxy could be propagated to the
real PM before/after
deassociation in the Thread-local (why an implementation specific variable ?
Is it really needed to be implementation specific ?)
In a J
Hi Dain,
Thanks for your comments. These rules are intended to be identical to
the JPA semantics. One intended side effect is that the container
can simply make the PMF call to get a proxy in order to inject a PM
into a component. Of course, container injection behavior is not
specified
Sounds exactly like the JPA rules, so it makes sense to me. If there
are supposed to be differences in comparison to the JPA rules, I
suggest you explicitly call them out due the the extreme similarity
between the two in this text.
-dain
On Feb 9, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> What's RESOURCE_LOCAL? Non JCA?
See JPA spec 6.2.1.2. Non JTA
--
Andy
What's RESOURCE_LOCAL? Non JCA?
Quoting Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please review and comment on this proposed change to the
> specification, as part of the JDO 2.1 maintenance release.
>
>
> (PersistenceManagerFactory interface)
> 11.3.1 Access via proxy
> PersistenceManager getPersi
Please review and comment on this proposed change to the
specification, as part of the JDO 2.1 maintenance release.
(PersistenceManagerFactory interface)
11.3.1 Access via proxy
PersistenceManager getPersistenceManagerProxy();
Returns a PersistenceManager instance that is thread-safe, for use
10 matches
Mail list logo
