[jira] Commented: (JDO-402) checkRemoveGroup - removeGroup should be before getGroups

2006-08-06 Thread Andy Jefferson (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-402?page=comments#action_12426035 ] Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-402: Understood. The original test does fail with the change to backing store copy (in JPOX CVS). Just need someone to apply the

[jira] Commented: (JDO-402) checkRemoveGroup - removeGroup should be before getGroups

2006-08-05 Thread Craig Russell (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-402?page=comments#action_12426007 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-402: --- Hi Andy, The spec does say the returned Set is immutable but that doesn't necessarily mean that the underlying Set is

[jira] Commented: (JDO-402) checkRemoveGroup - removeGroup should be before getGroups

2006-07-30 Thread Andy Jefferson (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-402?page=comments#action_12424399 ] Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-402: The spec isnt totally silent (12.7.5 comment line in the code for getGroups). Erik asked the question on the mailing list on

[jira] Commented: (JDO-402) checkRemoveGroup - removeGroup should be before getGroups

2006-07-29 Thread Ilan Kirsh (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-402?page=comments#action_12424341 ] Ilan Kirsh commented on JDO-402: Thanks for the fix. I assume that the old code should work fine if the implementation returns from getGroup a shared set that is