Re: [PR] JDO-830: Migrate JUnit tests in tck to version 5 (db-jdo)

2023-11-21 Thread via GitHub
mboapache merged PR #85: URL: https://github.com/apache/db-jdo/pull/85 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jdo-dev-unsubscr...@db.apache.org

Re: [PR] JDO-830: Migrate JUnit tests in tck to version 5 (db-jdo)

2023-11-21 Thread via GitHub
sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #85: URL: https://github.com/apache/db-jdo/pull/85#issuecomment-1821514067 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    [![Quality Gate passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/passed-16px.png 'Quality G

Re: [PR] JDO-830: Migrate JUnit tests in tck to version 5 (db-jdo)

2023-11-19 Thread via GitHub
mboapache commented on PR #85: URL: https://github.com/apache/db-jdo/pull/85#issuecomment-1817966299 I found the problem of issues 2. and 3. from above: now the datanucleus output is store in the -jdori.txt file and the logger output of the TCK test classes go into the -tck.txt files. Fix i

Re: [PR] JDO-830: Migrate JUnit tests in tck to version 5 (db-jdo)

2023-11-19 Thread via GitHub
sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #85: URL: https://github.com/apache/db-jdo/pull/85#issuecomment-1817963484 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    [![Quality Gate passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/passed-16px.png 'Quality G

Re: [PR] JDO-830: Migrate JUnit tests in tck to version 5 (db-jdo)

2023-11-18 Thread via GitHub
sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #85: URL: https://github.com/apache/db-jdo/pull/85#issuecomment-1817586768 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    [![Quality Gate passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/passed-16px.png 'Quality G

Re: [PR] JDO-830: Migrate JUnit tests in tck to version 5 (db-jdo)

2023-11-18 Thread via GitHub
mboapache commented on PR #85: URL: https://github.com/apache/db-jdo/pull/85#issuecomment-1817585647 1. About the test log output: this is what I have mentioned before, you should print the output using more -R or less -R. If we do not like this output, then we need to find a JUnit launc

Re: [PR] JDO-830: Migrate JUnit tests in tck to version 5 (db-jdo)

2023-11-18 Thread via GitHub
tzaeschke commented on PR #85: URL: https://github.com/apache/db-jdo/pull/85#issuecomment-1817496798 A failed test looks like this: [app-relationshipAllRelationships-junit.txt](https://github.com/apache/db-jdo/files/13400258/app-relationshipAllRelationships-junit.txt) -- This is an au

Re: [PR] JDO-830: Migrate JUnit tests in tck to version 5 (db-jdo)

2023-11-18 Thread via GitHub
tzaeschke commented on PR #85: URL: https://github.com/apache/db-jdo/pull/85#issuecomment-1817493730 For me the test log output is scrambled. For example the file `app-company1-1Relationships-junit.txt` looks like this: ``` . '-- JUnit Jupiter [OK

Re: [PR] JDO-830: Migrate JUnit tests in tck to version 5 (db-jdo)

2023-11-09 Thread via GitHub
sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #85: URL: https://github.com/apache/db-jdo/pull/85#issuecomment-1804648411 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    [![Quality Gate passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/passed-16px.png 'Quality G

Re: [PR] JDO-830: Migrate JUnit tests in tck to version 5 (db-jdo)

2023-11-06 Thread via GitHub
sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #85: URL: https://github.com/apache/db-jdo/pull/85#issuecomment-1794402762 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    [![Quality Gate passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/passed-16px.png 'Quality G