Re: Dev meet-up in FOSDEM 2014

... and JFokus at same time http://www.jfokus.se/jfokus/ 2013/11/6 Jyrki Puttonen > I'd like to join too, and Friday would be better, as there's Config > Management Camp ( http://cfgmgmtcamp.eu/ ) on 3 and 4 February. > > Jyrki > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Vincent Latombe > wrote: > >

Re: Dev meet-up in FOSDEM 2014

I'd like to join too, and Friday would be better, as there's Config Management Camp ( http://cfgmgmtcamp.eu/ ) on 3 and 4 February. Jyrki On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Vincent Latombe wrote: > I'd be happy to join! > > Vincent > > > 2013/11/4 Kevin Fleming (BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEXIN) > > Monday w

Re: unit test failure on jenkins_main_trunk build for pull request

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Hangsu Ma wrote: > I dont think these unit tests are related to the pull request, is there any > thing i need to do here? Either 1. Run those tests locally, and mention the result in the PR. or 2. Merge master into your branch and push the merge, triggering a ne

Re: JENKINS-18641: Changes to Stapler's JavaScript proxy will break plugins depending on it

Thanks! I'll recommend to people to upgrade to 1.528 then On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Sandell, Robert < robert.sand...@sonymobile.com> wrote: > There is a fix in stapler 1.217 relating to this [1] from early Aug and > integrated into core 1.528 [2] > > > > [1] > https://github.com/stapler/st

RE: JENKINS-18641: Changes to Stapler's JavaScript proxy will break plugins depending on it

There is a fix in stapler 1.217 relating to this [1] from early Aug and integrated into core 1.528 [2] [1] https://github.com/stapler/stapler/commit/8139b3364f63ae0c723a458e540c643cae43113b [2] https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/commit/7e8bbea3336dc65a10c2fd69a20beac20bc6fca3 Robert Sandell

Re: JENKINS-18641: Changes to Stapler's JavaScript proxy will break plugins depending on it

Was there ever a resolution to this? This seems to be breaking something in email-ext on certain the versions of Jenkins mentioned in the original post. slide On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Sandell, Robert < robert.sand...@sonymobile.com> wrote: > I took another look at how the bind tag behave

Re: New Plugin - ScriptCS

Forked to https://github.com/jenkinsci/scriptcs-plugin and you are added as a committer. On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:26 AM, David Ogden wrote: > Ah I see, something that would wrap beanshell (for > example) and be called "ScriptJ" maybe? > > So... please may I have repo

Re: New Plugin - ScriptCS

Ah I see, something that would wrap beanshell (for example) and be called "ScriptJ" maybe? So... please may I have repo access? :) On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:08:57 AM UTC-6, slide wrote: > > What I meant was, if the scripts that the plugin runs were able to import

Re: New Plugin - ScriptCS

Which would be pretty cool! On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > yeah, you'd need ikvm or such to attempt that ;-) > > > On 5 November 2013 15:08, Slide wrote: > >> What I meant was, if the scripts that the plugin runs were able to import

Re: New Plugin - ScriptCS

yeah, you'd need ikvm or such to attempt that ;-) On 5 November 2013 15:08, Slide wrote: > What I meant was, if the scripts that the plugin runs were able to import > the Jenkins object model and call methods and so forth, but I don't think > that is the point of the plugin based on further ana

Re: New Plugin - ScriptCS

What I meant was, if the scripts that the plugin runs were able to import the Jenkins object model and call methods and so forth, but I don't think that is the point of the plugin based on further analysis. slide On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:46 AM, David Ogden wrote: > So if by integrate with the

Re: New Plugin - ScriptCS

So if by integrate with the object model you mean: "Jenkins' object model is extensible (for example, one can define additional SCM implementations, provided that they implement certain interfaces), and it supports the notion of "plugins," which can plug into those extensibility points and exte

unit test failure on jenkins_main_trunk build for pull request

Hi All, I noticed there is a build: https://jenkins.ci.cloudbees.com/job/core/job/jenkins_main_trunk/1324/ for my pull request, and there are 3 units failing. I dont think these unit tests are related to the pull request, is there any thing i need to do here? -- You received this message becaus

Re: Jenkins <> Koji integration plugin - call for features

I have not deployed a DEB build system similar to Koji at this point, I'm still investigating to decide what I want to use. - Original Message - From: vtu...@redhat.com To: Kevin Fleming (BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEXIN) Cc: jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com At: Nov 5 2013 07:53:10 I am not very fami

Re: New Plugin - Reports

Sounds like a view rather than needing a root action On 5 November 2013 10:14, mr.kenneth.graham wrote: > It is not an exception in my code. It is the message " is > missing the Overall/Administer permission". > > The "Reports" produced is a single page for managing the complexity of > an Jenki

Re: Jenkins <> Koji integration plugin - call for features

I am not very familiar with DEB build systems similar to Koji. If there will be some similarities I could create an API in my integration to make it plugable for DEB build systems in the future. Could you please post more information on what cluster DEB system do you use? Or do you build the p

Re: How do I keep cloudbees from building the gh-pages branch

indeed, sorry 2013/11/5 Hakan Tandoğan > The site build job you have created does not seem to run on git changes > like the main one does. Could this be added please? > > > On Thursday, October 31, 2013 2:08:50 PM UTC+1, nicolas de loof wrote: > >> I created https://jenkins.ci.cloudbees.com/job

Re: How do I keep cloudbees from building the gh-pages branch

The site build job you have created does not seem to run on git changes like the main one does. Could this be added please? On Thursday, October 31, 2013 2:08:50 PM UTC+1, nicolas de loof wrote: > > I created > https://jenkins.ci.cloudbees.com/job/plugins/job/transifex-plugin-site/as a > short

Re: Request hosting: NeoLoad Plugin

Hi Nicolas, It's "NeotysPluginSupport" thanks -Aaron On 05/11/2013 11:33, nicolas de loof wrote: there's no jenkinsci/neoload-plugin-developers repository what's your github ID ? I'll grant you access to jenkinsci/neoload-plugin 2013/11/5 Aaron Johnson >

Re: Request hosting: NeoLoad Plugin

there's no jenkinsci/neoload-plugin-developers repository what's your github ID ? I'll grant you access to jenkinsci/neoload-plugin 2013/11/5 Aaron Johnson > Hi, > > It looks like I have access to a repository named > jenkinsci/neoload-plugin-developers and no access at all to > jenkinsci/neo

Re: Request hosting: NeoLoad Plugin

Hi, It looks like I have access to a repository named jenkinsci/neoload-plugin-developers and no access at all to jenkinsci/neoload-plugin. Or maybe I've misunderstood something, but I can't get any push requests to work to https://github.com/jenkinsci/neoload-plugin and it seems that I do h

Re: New Plugin - Reports

It is not an exception in my code. It is the message " is missing the Overall/Administer permission". The "Reports" produced is a single page for managing the complexity of an Jenkins deployment with many jobs. It is not appropriate to add an SCM column to a view, because of multiple entries for

AW: Deployment issues

Hi Ulli, my first release was seven months ago and yesterday it stopped working with the below error message. I don't use credentials in the settings.xml, I used the parameters -Dusername and -Dpassword. Björn -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com [mailto:jenkinsc