Re: Path environment variable not set by SimpleBuildWrapper.Context.env() on Windows slave

2017-07-07 Thread Oleg Nenashev
EnvInject Bug for it: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-26583 I have a plan to fix it, but right now it is not a top priority for me. The plugin is looking for adopters четверг, 6 июля 2017 г., 18:30:07 UTC+2 пользователь 15 knots написал: > > 2017-07-06 13:45 GMT+02:00 15 knots >: >

Re: [Proposal] Making all things Stapler more declarative

2017-07-07 Thread Stephen Connolly
Ok, so that people can see code rather than just yapping on the M-L (and given that we seem to be OK with the annotation names) https://github.com/stapler/stapler/pull/121 Is where I am working on this proposal. We can continue the discussion in either place as appropriate (general comments here,

Plugin maintenance: slack-plugin

2017-07-07 Thread Gustavo Maia
Hi. I've been talking with Sam Gleske about helping to maintain the slack-plugin and he asked me to go ahead and submit the request here. Here's the main conversation: https://github.com/jenkinsci/slack-plugin/pull/324 I've @ mentioned Kurt on the PR as well, but haven't got a response yet. Kurt, i

Re: jenkins jpi plugin problems

2017-07-07 Thread Robert Sandell
Not sure how the gradle plugin works, but createMavenProject was removed from the jenkins test harness some time ago since MavenProject wasn't part of core any more. you should use createProject(MavenProject.class) instead. /B 2017-07-07 14:36 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Marshall : > I upgraded my groovy

jenkins jpi plugin problems

2017-07-07 Thread Jeremy Marshall
I upgraded my groovy plugin to jpi 0.22.0 but now I get a strange error in the tests ``` org.jenkinsci.plugins.GroovyScriptMESSpec > two axis success script FAILED groovy.lang.MissingMethodException: No signature of method: org.jvnet.hudson.test.JenkinsRule.createMatrixProject() is applicabl

Re: [Proposal] Making all things Stapler more declarative

2017-07-07 Thread Stephen Connolly
Yes I was thinking that a custom javadoc handler would be useful. Especially as there are inheritance of facets and fragments that we'd want to see documented correctly. On 7 July 2017 at 02:37, Robert Sandell wrote: > I agree with Stephen here; adding methods seems risky and could break > exist

ATTN: Plugin developers who use IntelliJ

2017-07-07 Thread Stephen Connolly
Please vote for https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-175538 if you want to be able to plugin run unit tests from IntelliJ using recent versions of the plugin parent. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [Proposal] Making all things Stapler more declarative

2017-07-07 Thread Robert Sandell
I agree with Stephen here; adding methods seems risky and could break existing plugins, at least in a backwards compat sense. But I at the same time do like the idea of getting javadoc for the facets and fragments. So can we get both somehow? E.g. if there is a @StaplerFacet("login") or @StaplerFr