Re: GSoC 2019 - Remoting project ideas

Hi, I am happy to help as a mentor for GSoC this year. I will try to check the details and get back to you about my ideas asap. I will join the GSoC weekly meeting from next week so that we can discuss about this topic. (Sorry for not attending the meeting last month, I was a bit busy + holiday per

Re: GSoC 2019 - Remoting project ideas

These sound like good projects. It would be nice to get a GSoC project going in Remoting. Last year’s project was a very good, productive one. At this time I don’t know that I can commit to being a primary mentor but I could help out some. Jeff Thompson > On Jan 3, 2019, at 4:00 AM, Oleg Nenas

Re: Be able to merge on core

+1 Ramón has been contributing lots of great work in authoring and reviewing PRS and other efforts. Jeff Thompson > On Jan 2, 2019, at 9:50 AM, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > > I agree with this request. > > Ramon has helped a lot also recently on ATH and a few other components >

Re: Request to join organization

+1 from me. Fran does good work and granting him the permissions will help get more productive stuff done in Jenkins. Jeff Thompson > On Jan 2, 2019, at 9:51 AM, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > > +1 from me. > > Le jeu. 27 déc. 2018 à 12:14, > a écrit : > Hi all,

Re: [Plugin adoption] stash-pullrequest-builder-plugin

> CCing the git commit email of previous maintainer. > > So much for that: DNS Error: 11045696 DNS type 'mx' lookup of quanitum.com.au responded with code NXDOMAIN Domain name not found: quanitum.com.au -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins De

[Plugin adoption] stash-pullrequest-builder-plugin

Hi, I'd like to become a maintainer of https://plugins.jenkins.io/stash-pullrequest-builder The plugin is not listed as "for adoption" but it looks abandoned. There has been no response since October here https://github.com/nemccarthy/stash-pullrequest-builder-plugin/issues/150 I've also created

Re: GSoC 2019 - Remoting project ideas

I have also added the Jenkins Developers mailing list to Cc so that we can get more inputs and ideas On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 11:20 AM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hi all, > > Just to follow-up on the Remoting topic, it would be great to have a GSoC > project idea for Remoting this year. You were intere

Re: GSoC proposal about the Multi-branch for Gitlab

I've made some changes. Consider that the current proposal could be a little scope for GSoC. How about let it covers multi git provider. Like gitea and gitlab. On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 9:45 PM arch wrote: > Agree with this. > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:19 PM Oleg Nenashev > wrote: > >> Hi Rick, >

Re: Discussion: Community Onboarding/Outreach and Advocacy SIGs

UPD: I managed to mess up the Gitter channel name. The new one is https://gitter.im/jenkinsci/advocacy-and-outreach-sig On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 10:49:19 AM UTC+1, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > We were unable to get more feedback regarding the SIG naming. In order to > unblock that, I change m

Re: Discussion: Community Onboarding/Outreach and Advocacy SIGs

+1 from Rick On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 5:49 PM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > We were unable to get more feedback regarding the SIG naming. In order to > unblock that, I change my vote to "Advocacy and Outreach" which is a Top-1 > name in Liam's list. I believe we consider the name as decided then. > > I h

Re: Discussion: Community Onboarding/Outreach and Advocacy SIGs

We were unable to get more feedback regarding the SIG naming. In order to unblock that, I change my vote to "Advocacy and Outreach" which is a Top-1 name in Liam's list. I believe we consider the name as decided then. I have created https://gitter.im/jenkinsci/community-and-outreach-sig so that

Re: The future of LTS certification

Hello and happy new year. Splitting the ATH tests is very interesting from my PoV. It will let plugin developers be more conscious of its existence and perhaps, it could help to have a more well maintained and useful set of tests. Best regards. On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 10:17 AM Oleg Nenashev wrot

Re: Google Summer of Code 2019

Hi all, Here is also a blogpost from Martin. Just to provide some update here, right now we have 14 project ideas and 15 potential mentors. It is already enough to apply for

Re: The future of LTS certification

Thanks for the interest Sahil! My advice would be to stick to Docker for now, unless you see special benefits of K8s and other systems. We do not have a ready-to-fly Kubernetes setup inside the Jenkins infrastructure, and it's also quite complicated to do local development with it. I would li

Jenkins 2.150.2 LTS RC testing started

Hello everyone, Latest LTS RC was made public and it is ready to be tested. Final release is scheduled for 2019-01-16. Please, report your findings in this thread. Download bits from http://mirrors.jenkins-ci.org/war-stable-rc/2.150.2/jenkins.war Thanks! -- oliver -- You received this mes