Re: Proposal: Official Docker Image maintenance team (Jenkins and Agents)

I think it's actually quite useful when pinging people? Also when reading such mentions on PRs and the likes, we immediately know it's a team. Also a bit useful for auto-completion easiness I believe. I will not fight for this though :). Either way is still ok for me. My 2 cents Le ven. 13 déc.

Re: Proposal: Official Docker Image maintenance team (Jenkins and Agents)

The reason of the "team-" suffix was to follow the same convention as for SIGs in JEP-4 (sig-...). But I have no strong opinion, happy to remove it On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 10:38 Ivan Fernandez Calvo wrote: > I'd like to be involved also at least on the testing part > > El martes, 10 de diciembre

Re: Jenkins Plugin pom (future of)

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 4:24 PM James Nord wrote: > There is also the support for javascript builds, but a quick search of repos > showed only 29 repositories … that use this … so I would argue this is better > handled by documentation or another possibly another pom 29 repositories is quite a

Re: Jenkins Plugin pom (future of)

Some housekeeping in the plugin POM sounds good to me. > for my part we have a lot of properties that are overloaded in profiles > (skipTests is a surefire flag but we abuse it to also skip spotbugs which > when you know how maven works becomes surprising) I was always a bit confused by that

Re: Q: rename a variable without breaking compatibility in the declarative pipeline

Sure, thanks for all the information. I've raise an issue to track this conversation: - https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-60466 Cheers -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: Adopt a plugin request

Yes that's the one, Terry On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, 2:38 pm Slide, wrote: > Is this plugin hosted in the jenkinsci org? I found > https://github.com/jenkinsci/appspider-build-scanner-plugin. Is that the > correct one? > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 02:37 Terry Moreland > wrote: > >> I'm requesting to

Re: Adopt a plugin request

Is this plugin hosted in the jenkinsci org? I found https://github.com/jenkinsci/appspider-build-scanner-plugin. Is that the correct one? On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 02:37 Terry Moreland wrote: > I'm requesting to be made maintainer for the AppSpider Jenkinsci plugin > using either of the following

Re: Adopt a plugin request

Apologies, I missed that part; that email is currently forwarding to terry_morel...@rapid7.com Terry On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, 10:52 am Baptiste Mathus, wrote: > Please also add existing/current maintainers in CC, we'll need either > her/his/their approvals, or wait 14 days usual timeout. > Cf.

Re: findsecbugs in spotbugs

On Thursday, December 12, 2019 at 6:28:21 PM UTC, Jeff Thompson wrote: > > On 12/12/19 7:10 AM, Jesse Glick wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 2:06 PM Jeff Thompson > wrote: > > As I was analyzing one findsecbugs finding, I immediately recognized it as > SECURITY-1322 […] > If someone had

Re: Adopt a plugin request

Please also add existing/current maintainers in CC, we'll need either her/his/their approvals, or wait 14 days usual timeout. Cf. https://jenkins.io/doc/developer/plugin-governance/adopt-a-plugin/ On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:37 AM Terry Moreland wrote: > I'm requesting to be made maintainer for

Re: Proposal: Official Docker Image maintenance team (Jenkins and Agents)

I'd like to be involved also at least on the testing part El martes, 10 de diciembre de 2019, 12:34:05 (UTC+1), Oleg Nenashev escribió: > > BTW, I suggest the following list of maintainers based on the recent > activity: > >- Mark Waite >- Alex Earl >- Carlos Sanchez >- Oleg

Adopt a plugin request

I'm requesting to be made maintainer for the AppSpider Jenkinsci plugin using either of the following git accounts. jenkinsci: https://plugins.jenkins.io/jenkinsci-appspider-plugin

Re: Proposal: New twitter contributors

Good going @Oleg Nenashev and @Mark Waite. On Wednesday, 11 December 2019 22:05:28 UTC+5:30, Tracy Miranda wrote: > > Hi all, > > As per the process outlined in JEP 10 > , I would like to > propose two new Twitter Contributors for the