Re: Plugin adoption request: publish-over-cifs

2020-06-19 Thread Patrick Wilkerson
Thank you! On Friday, June 19, 2020 at 11:09:28 AM UTC-7, slide wrote: > > You should be good to go on permissions to the repo and with release > permissions. Welcome aboard! > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:06 AM Slide > > wrote: > >> +1 from me as the most recent maintainer. One thing to note i

Re: Plugin adoption request: publish-over-cifs

2020-06-19 Thread Slide
You should be good to go on permissions to the repo and with release permissions. Welcome aboard! On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:06 AM Slide wrote: > +1 from me as the most recent maintainer. One thing to note is that > po-cifs relies heavily on the po plugin (it's the basis for multiple po > plugin

Re: Plugin adoption request: publish-over-cifs

2020-06-19 Thread Slide
+1 from me as the most recent maintainer. One thing to note is that po-cifs relies heavily on the po plugin (it's the basis for multiple po plugins), so you may need to maintain that one as well. On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:04 AM Patrick Wilkerson wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to adopt publish

Plugin adoption request: publish-over-cifs

2020-06-19 Thread Patrick Wilkerson
Hello, I would like to adopt publish-over-cifs plugin. I am wanting to submit a fix for JENKINS-18242. I have submitted a pull request 14 days ago and have had no response (also plugin is marked for adoption). * Link to a plugin you want to adopt: https://github.com/jenkinsci/publish-over-ci

Re: Proposal: Jenkins Code of Conduct update (Contributor Covenant 1.3 -> 1.4)

2020-06-19 Thread Oleg Nenashev
UPD: At the Jun 17 Governance meeting we discussed the Code of Conduct update and agreed to go forward with updating to Contributor Covenant 2.0 (6 votes in favor, no against/abstains). We have NOT approved the new code of Conduct yet. Next steps: - Oleg - to propose a pull request to jenki

Re: Jenkins Governance Meeting on Jun 17, 2020

2020-06-19 Thread Oleg Nenashev
Hi all, Materials from the meeting: - Recording: https://youtu.be/3g0GKvVHfgI - Meeting notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/11Nr8QpqYgBiZjORplL_3Zkwys2qK1vEvK-NYyYa4rzg/edit#heading=h.cgd8zbewht8o - Summary: At this meeting we discussed the terminology updates and agreed o

Re: GitHub issues option in HOSTING

2020-06-19 Thread Radosław Antoniuk
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:30 PM Tim Jacomb wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 10:36, Daniel Beck wrote: > >> Having a screen like >> https://github.com/jenkinsci/configuration-as-code-plugin/issues/new/choose >> could help here, but that's far from universal right now. Is this something >> that co

Re: GitHub issues option in HOSTING

2020-06-19 Thread Tim Jacomb
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 10:36, Daniel Beck wrote: > Having a screen like > https://github.com/jenkinsci/configuration-as-code-plugin/issues/new/choose > could help here, but that's far from universal right now. Is this something > that could be defined via .github? Having a screen similar to this

Re: Interested in contributing

2020-06-19 Thread Daniel Beck
> On 18. Jun 2020, at 21:51, Fábio Silva wrote: > > Since one of the pull requests has already been accepted, what should I do to > make it merged? Do I need more privileges? > Wait a while first. These PRs are all only a few days old, maintainers typically review things during their spare

Re: GitHub issues option in HOSTING

2020-06-19 Thread Daniel Beck
> On 19. Jun 2020, at 11:47, Radosław Antoniuk wrote: > >> I would be surprised if we wouldn't regularly get 0-days because people with >> just a GH account don't bother to do it properly, and just report issues on >> GH. If that is enabled in repos without someone regularly reviewing incomi

Re: GitHub issues option in HOSTING

2020-06-19 Thread Radosław Antoniuk
> > I would be surprised if we wouldn't regularly get 0-days because people > with just a GH account don't bother to do it properly, and just report > issues on GH. If that is enabled in repos without someone regularly > reviewing incoming issues, or by a maintainer who's unaware of how we > handle

Re: GitHub issues option in HOSTING

2020-06-19 Thread Daniel Beck
> On 18. Jun 2020, at 22:50, Tim Jacomb wrote: > > The security team already uses a different project in Jira to everyone else, > I don't think we need to change that currently, maintainers will just use > whatever the security team decides I would think? > > Mentioned this earlier: > > One

Re: GitHub issues option in HOSTING

2020-06-19 Thread Tim Jacomb
To add to Jesse's numbers here's a summary for the JenkinsCI organisation: Org report: jenkinsci Total repositories: 2290 Number with GitHub issues enabled: 355 (15%) Total issues open: 3338 Total issues closed: 17941 Total issues: 21279 https://gist.github.com/timja/a939f198752b218c3270ac043eb08