Re: Did Tippy.js add Popper2 to Jenkins core?

I totally agree for jenkins components to be exposed, but not artifacts of those ui components because it leads to the 15 years of trying to get rid of prototype because people used it directly. On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 11:57 AM Ullrich Hafner wrote: > > > >> I think that users also will benefit

Re: Did Tippy.js add Popper2 to Jenkins core?

> >> I think that users also will benefit from views that do not load the same >> library multiple times (loading time of a page). Also it duplicates the >> development effort if we create a plugin API for each JS library that we are >> using in core. > > These are indeed benefits, but I think th

Re: Did Tippy.js add Popper2 to Jenkins core?

> Can Webpack be made to build a library under a hidden (shaded) namespace, with core consuming the private version? You explicitly have to configure things to make bundled libraries global. by default require("") statements are localized, so `const $ = require('jquery')` would not make it public.

Re: Did Tippy.js add Popper2 to Jenkins core?

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:28 AM Ullrich Hafner wrote: > In JS and CSS and Jelly we have no concepts of encapsulation and APIs in the > moment. Everything what is available in the browser is public by default. In > JS this is even more complex to hide than in Java. Can Webpack be made to build a

Re: Maven 3.9.2: ready to roll?

+1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.goo

Re: Maven 3.9.2: ready to roll?

Same here, I've been using it locally with no problem. Le mar. 23 mai 2023, 14:04, Mark Waite a écrit : > > > On Tuesday, May 23, 2023 at 1:57:48 AM UTC-6 Damien Duportal wrote: > > Hello dear maintainers, > > Is there any objection against the deployment of Maven 3.9.2 in the > Jenkins infrastr

Re: Maven 3.9.2: ready to roll?

On Tuesday, May 23, 2023 at 1:57:48 AM UTC-6 Damien Duportal wrote: Hello dear maintainers, Is there any objection against the deployment of Maven 3.9.2 in the Jenkins infrastructure? No objection from me. I've used it since shortly after it released and have found no blocking issues with

Re: Maven 3.9.2: ready to roll?

I'm already using it locally with Java 20.0.1 and 17 for Jenkins core, libraries, and a few plugins without issues 🚀 On Tuesday, 23 May 2023 at 09:57:48 UTC+2 damien@gmail.com wrote: > Hello dear maintainers, > > Is there any objection against the deployment of Maven 3.9.2 in the > Jenkins

Re: CDF Project Representative nominations

I am also +1 that Mark would be a good representative person of the Jenkins project for the CDF TOC. > Am 22.05.2023 um 21:14 schrieb Alyssa Tong : > > Thank you Oleg for your role in the CDF TOC. > I am +1 for Mark as TOC candidate for Jenkins. > > BR, > alyssa > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at

Maven 3.9.2: ready to roll?

Hello dear maintainers, Is there any objection against the deployment of Maven 3.9.2 in the Jenkins infrastructure? For the Jenkins Infra. team, Damien DUPORTAL -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: Did Tippy.js add Popper2 to Jenkins core?

In JS and CSS and Jelly we have no concepts of encapsulation and APIs in the moment. Everything what is available in the browser is public by default. In JS this is even more complex to hide than in Java. I think that users also will benefit from views that do not load the same library multiple