Re: Jenkins BOM and base Jenkins version

2020-11-23 Thread Jesse Glick
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 1:18 PM Basil Crow wrote: > The documentation says Yes; no solid consensus here: https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins.io/pull/3643#discussion_r475615780 I would suggest 2.204.6 but if you prefer 2.204.1 I am also fine with cutting an extra release of

Re: Jenkins BOM and base Jenkins version

2020-11-23 Thread Ullrich Hafner
I’m not sure if it makes sense to revert that for existing releases. However, we should double check every time we upgrade to a new baseline that we use the .1 version. Currently we already have some new plugin releases that require a core of 1.222.4 (and not 1.222.1). This should be avoided.

Re: Jenkins BOM and base Jenkins version

2020-11-23 Thread Basil Crow
The documentation says: "Prefer .1 LTS releases over weekly versions and later releases within an LTS line for greater compatibility." cloudbees-folder seems to use 2.204.6 because its dependency snakeyaml-api

Re: Jenkins BOM and base Jenkins version

2020-11-23 Thread Tim Jacomb
If it help the docs are recommending either 2.222 or 2.235 https://www.jenkins.io/doc/developer/plugin-development/choosing-jenkins-baseline/#currently-recommended-versions On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 17:30, Matt Sicker wrote: > Whichever LTS version you use should probably be kept up to date with

Re: Jenkins BOM and base Jenkins version

2020-11-23 Thread Matt Sicker
Whichever LTS version you use should probably be kept up to date with the latest security patch version for that LTS. No preference from me on 2.204.x versus 2.222.x. On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:24 AM Mark Waite wrote: > > The git plugin currently requires Jenkins 2.204.1 and uses the plugin bom

Jenkins BOM and base Jenkins version

2020-11-23 Thread Mark Waite
The git plugin currently requires Jenkins 2.204.1 and uses the plugin bom to simplify dependency management. I like the results of that simplification very much. A dependabot pull request has proposed to update the git plugin use of