Re: Pull Request for Jenkins SVNKit fork (JENKINS-14551 resolution)

2013-05-30 Thread Chris Z.
Hi Kenny, Thanks for analysis, just to be sure I also checked subversion-plugin source code and also there I couldn't find any usage of this function. I will create minor jenkins issue just to remember about it. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Kenny Ayers theotherwhitem...@gmail.comwrote:

Re: Pull Request for Jenkins SVNKit fork (JENKINS-14551 resolution)

2013-05-30 Thread Stephen Connolly
did you check for jelly EL expressions? On 30 May 2013 11:02, Chris Z. winotu.em...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kenny, Thanks for analysis, just to be sure I also checked subversion-plugin source code and also there I couldn't find any usage of this function. I will create minor jenkins issue just

Re: Pull Request for Jenkins SVNKit fork (JENKINS-14551 resolution)

2013-05-30 Thread Chris Z.
Hi, I've grepped whole subversion-plugin project and couldn't find any usage. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: did you check for jelly EL expressions? On 30 May 2013 11:02, Chris Z. winotu.em...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kenny, Thanks

Aw: Re: Pull Request for Jenkins SVNKit fork (JENKINS-14551 resolution)

2013-05-29 Thread Christoph Kutzinski
:24 Uhr Von:Kenny Ayers theotherwhitem...@gmail.com An:jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com Betreff:Re: Pull Request for Jenkins SVNKit fork (JENKINS-14551 resolution) Maybe I can appeal to how useful this will be for the community - this resolves the 10th most voted on issue in the Jenkins bugtracker

Re: Re: Pull Request for Jenkins SVNKit fork (JENKINS-14551 resolution)

2013-05-29 Thread nicolas de loof
theotherwhitem...@gmail.com *An:* jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com *Betreff:* Re: Pull Request for Jenkins SVNKit fork (JENKINS-14551 resolution) Maybe I can appeal to how useful this will be for the community - this resolves the 10th most voted on issue in the Jenkins bugtracker (that is currently open

Re: Pull Request for Jenkins SVNKit fork (JENKINS-14551 resolution)

2013-05-29 Thread Chris Z.
. Mai 2013 um 05:24 Uhr *Von:* Kenny Ayers theotherwhitem...@gmail.com *An:* jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com *Betreff:* Re: Pull Request for Jenkins SVNKit fork (JENKINS-14551 resolution) Maybe I can appeal to how useful this will be for the community - this resolves the 10th most voted on issue

Re: Re: Pull Request for Jenkins SVNKit fork (JENKINS-14551 resolution)

2013-05-29 Thread Kenny
and raises once again for me the question how big the 'truck factor' of Jenkins actually is. *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 29. Mai 2013 um 05:24 Uhr *Von:* Kenny Ayers theotherwhitem...@gmail.com *An:* jenkinsci-dev@googlegroups.com *Betreff:* Re: Pull Request for Jenkins SVNKit fork (JENKINS-14551

Re: Pull Request for Jenkins SVNKit fork (JENKINS-14551 resolution)

2013-05-29 Thread Chris Z.
Hi Kenny, It's not an tmatesoft svnkit issue but jenkis svnkit port/fork issue. Actualy I didn't look what this changes/brake in the subversion but if it is in svnkit port/fork made by koshuke there was some logic behind that. I found this by accident when I was checkng what subversion plugin

Re: Pull Request for Jenkins SVNKit fork (JENKINS-14551 resolution)

2013-05-28 Thread Kenny Ayers
Kohsuke? Anyone? On Thursday, May 23, 2013 6:59:26 PM UTC-7, Kenny Ayers wrote: Hey folks, I haven't had any response on the pull request to fix JENKINS-14551 (issue here: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-14551) Confirmation from SVNKit dev of the fix here:

Re: Pull Request for Jenkins SVNKit fork (JENKINS-14551 resolution)

2013-05-28 Thread Kenny Ayers
Maybe I can appeal to how useful this will be for the community - this resolves the 10th most voted on issue in the Jenkins bugtracker (that is currently open, and not in progress):

Pull Request for Jenkins SVNKit fork (JENKINS-14551 resolution)

2013-05-23 Thread Kenny Ayers
Hey folks, I haven't had any response on the pull request to fix JENKINS-14551 (issue here: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-14551) Confirmation from SVNKit dev of the fix here: http://issues.tmatesoft.com/issue/SVNKIT-368 Discussion of the issue and fix here: