Re: potential regression in master

2021-09-06 Thread Basil Crow
Already done in jnr/jnr-ffi#269 jenkinsci/jenkins#5712 On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 9:36 AM jn...@cloudbees.com wrote: > You just beat me to it! > > creating the PRs. > > On Monday, September 6, 2021 at 5:28:34 PM UTC+1 m...@basilcrow.com wrote: > >> It's jenkinsci/jenkins#5703, which pulled in

Re: potential regression in master

2021-09-06 Thread jn...@cloudbees.com
You just beat me to it! creating the PRs. On Monday, September 6, 2021 at 5:28:34 PM UTC+1 m...@basilcrow.com wrote: > It's jenkinsci/jenkins#5703, which pulled in jnr/jnr-ffi#252, which > updated JUnit from 4 to 5 in jnr-ffi without putting the new JUnit 5 > JAR in the test scope. That means

Re: potential regression in master

2021-09-06 Thread Basil Crow
It's jenkinsci/jenkins#5703, which pulled in jnr/jnr-ffi#252, which updated JUnit from 4 to 5 in jnr-ffi without putting the new JUnit 5 JAR in the test scope. That means the following JARs are now (erroneously) bundled in the Jenkins WAR: [INFO] +-

Re: potential regression in master

2021-09-06 Thread Mark Waite
Thanks for investigating. Weekly release is scheduled to run tomorrow. On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:00 AM jn...@cloudbees.com wrote: > Hi all, > > something is looking very fishy with the incrementals built recently. > > basically no tests run for plugins (at all) > > It is not that they do fail,