Re: [workflow-plugin] dependencies between parallel steps?

On Sunday, December 14, 2014 9:26:58 PM UTC-5, Alexander Bertram wrote: > > But it looks like I need to implement a waitFor primitive > JENKINS-25570 is implemented in 1.2 and adds a waitUntil step. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Users" gr

Re: [workflow-plugin] dependencies between parallel steps?

Yes! That's perfect. Are you working on JENKINS-26052 now or is this something I could submit a pull request for? Will comment further on JENKINS-26052. Best, Alex On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 11:45:29 PM UTC+1, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote: > > I think JENKINS-26052

Re: [workflow-plugin] dependencies between parallel steps?

I think JENKINS-26052 would be a natural solution for this. parallel() has a different emphasis from yours. I also thought about building a library on top of workflow that lets you declare tasks with dependencies and have the library figure out

[workflow-plugin] dependencies between parallel steps?

I'm experimenting with the moving some hacky build proccesses into the great new workflow plugin, but not sure how to best handle dependencies between parallel steps. The workflow is meant to test a release candidate of an R-language interpreter against a library of a few thousand packages, som