installations (249 slaves
for 38 jobs?) could be due to a bug in how Jenkins reports job numbers
(JENKINS-21448).
On 19.01.2014, at 00:55, Kirill Evstigneev wrote:
> It would be nice to have a list of large Jenkins installations. With numbers
> - how many jobs and builds they run, numbe
It would be nice to have a list of large Jenkins installations. With
numbers - how many jobs and builds they run, number of slaves, hardware
specs etc. There are (sometimes reasonable) concerns regarding Jenkins
performance. So such real world evidence will help to address it and to
assess
