I could, but this is long and tedious... and I would lose the history...
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:38 AM, bthiebault
> wrote:
> > Thanks for your answer.
> >
> > I indeed had seen this bold red text notice but was wondering if it was
> only
I've been contemplating writing a conversion plugin, but I don't know
enough about the new Hudson format yet to do it.
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:38 AM, bthiebault
> wrote:
> > Thanks for your answer.
> >
> > I indeed had seen this bold red t
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:38 AM, bthiebault wrote:
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> I indeed had seen this bold red text notice but was wondering if it was only
> not supported or completely impossible. I guess I have my answer...
> I will thus go back to Hudson.
Can you re-create the jobs under jenk
Thanks for your answer.
I indeed had seen this bold red text notice but was wondering if it was
only not supported or completely impossible. I guess I have my answer...
I will thus go back to Hudson.
Kind regards,
Ben
On Monday, 7 January 2013 15:01:44 UTC+1, slide wrote:
>
> If you look at th
If you look at the wiki page for migrating from Hudson, you'll notice in
bold red text that you can only upgrade from <=1.398 reliably. Hudson
changed the format of their XML after that and so the formats are no longer
compatible.
Sent from my Windows Phone
--
From: bth
