Hi,
I developed a personalization system based on JESS.
I have two main EJBs:
o The first one manages the rules that are stored on a relational database.
The rules are stored on groups using the Jess native format. It improves the
performance when they are loaded into the engine. The model
> I was hoping that you, the other person who replied about transforming
> rules from XML, or any of the other people transforming rules from XML
> could say something about the motivation there. Is it simply a neutral
> authoring technique affording the potential to use/retarget the ruleset
> wit
The RuleML initiative ( http://www.dfki.uni-kl.de/ruleml/ ) has been
working on a draft XML standard for expressing rules across engines.
For TrAX-compliant XML transforms using JESS, see XITE @ www.sphere.com
and Dr. Leff's work ( http://ecitizen.mit.edu/ecap3.html )
-- jack
John R. Callah
The url you sent looks wrong, it should be:
http://www.csee.umbc.edu/~finin/papers/iswc02/iswc02.pdf
but this one gives the following:
You don't have permission to access /~finin/papers/iswc02/iswc02.pdf on this
server.
alan
> -Original Message-
> From: tim finin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Jirtme BERNARD wrote:
> The way we used it is quite powerful: we wrote a RMI server that at
> initialisation parsed a XML files describing the rules, each XML rules
I was hoping that you, the other person who replied about transforming
rules from XML, or any of the other people transforming ru
> authoring technique affording the potential to use/retarget the ruleset > with/to multiple rule engines or do you perceive some other advantage > over writing raw Jess?
I think it is a very valid question. In our school when we were working on the project of Sweetjess (Translating RuleML to Jess
On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, tim finin wrote:
>
> (1) RuleML http://www.dfki.uni-kl.de/ruleml/
As nearly always seems the case, there have been several attempts at
something like this.
ILOG even took a stab at it, but the effort seems to be dead.
http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2001-05-17-a.html
-