Hi all,
Wow, a guy goes on vacation for the summer, and a lot of good stuff got
generated on the list in the mean time...I'm still absorbing it, but would
like to get my two cents worth in.
Let me first of all put in my vote for this feature: I believe it will have
very positive implications for
I think Orchard, Bob wrote:
> I guess I was thinking that this was a runtime thing and not a
> compile-time decision.
The implementation I came up with is nice because many different
features continue to work, but with the new semantics. In a nutshell,
what happens is that for facts that can be t
I think Prof. Michael Stiber wrote:
>
> If you're taking votes, mine would lie almost always on the side of
> keeping the language syntax simple. Please only add to the language
> syntax if the alternative is truly gruesome. For example, is the "{}"
> syntax better than just having a function t
Sorry about mixing the order in Alan's example and mine...
this would have been confusing.
> -Original Message-
> As you note, the per-pattern syntax could be ugly. Maybe PATTERN-SLOT
> patterns could be enclosed by square brackets instead of parentheses,
> or something like that? We're no
On Thursday, August 28, 2003, at 07:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you note, the per-pattern syntax could be ugly. Maybe PATTERN-SLOT
patterns could be enclosed by square brackets instead of parentheses,
or something like that? We're not actually constrained by traditional
LISP syntax, and I'
Hi Rosely,
The DAMLJessKB.java file provides a test
program.
Regards, Simone
- Original Message -
From:
rosely
kumoi
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:08
PM
Subject: JESS: DAMLJessKB
hi all,
just asking if someone from the list
I think Orchard, Bob wrote:
>
> First the 'single' slot activation is a bit mis-leading to me. I would
> prefer to see it labelled 'any' slot activation since any slot that
> is modifed can cause an activation (actually a 'match' of the pattern and
> not necessarily an activation -- rules are acti
Hi! I'm triying to conect PHP y jess.
I now how to conect php y java and I included the jess library on the top of my program.
But I can not load the "name.clp", I need to write all the instruccions in the "name.java".
I want to now how can I load the "name.clp"
the instruccion (batch name.c
My 2 cents worth ...
First the 'single' slot activation is a bit mis-leading to me. I would
prefer to see it labelled 'any' slot activation since any slot that
is modifed can cause an activation (actually a 'match' of the pattern and
not necessarily an activation -- rules are activated). Following
While this may sound like a whining session, I really do have a wish for the
list:
I would like to see JESS have an alternate language (JESS++) that is focused
on the object-oriented nature of the Java language. I would assume that all
the features of JESS could be incorporated into JESS++ without
I think Alan Moore wrote:
> (defrule should-activate-when-object-exists
>(other)
>(not (MyObject))
> =>
> )
>
> How would these patterns work? Since *no* slots are mentioned it isn't clear
> what would happen.
>
Good question! This requires special handling, but it does indeed work.
--
hi all,
just asking if someone from the list has already
use or try the DAMLJessKB. Already download it, but currently completely blind
with the api, there is no sample code to be tried for testing.
rosely
I think Alan Moore wrote:
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> How about:
>
> (declare (activation SLOT|TEMPLATE))
>
> or
>
> (declare (activate PER-SLOT|PER-TEMPLATE))
>
> or something similar.
>
> I suggest that you don't use the boolean form because, in the future, you
Another question...
Given patterns like:
(defclass MyObject com.myco.MyObject (activate PER-SLOT))
(defrule does-this-match
(MyObject)
=>
)
(defrule should-activate-when-object-exists
(other)
(not (MyObject))
=>
)
How would these patterns work? Since *no* slots are mentioned it isn't
How about:
(declare (activation SLOT|TEMPLATE))
or
(declare (activate PER-SLOT|PER-TEMPLATE))
or something similar.
I suggest that you don't use the boolean form because, in the future, you
might decide to add another activation strategy:
(declare (activation SLOT|TEMPLATE|KARMA))
Also, how
Hi Folks,
So I've got a partial implementation of this thing we've been calling
"single-slot activations"; this is the Jess mode in which if a fact is
matched by a rule, and some slot in that fact which is not explicitly
mentioned in the rule's patterns is modified, the rule's activation
state is
16 matches
Mail list logo
