I don't see any rules here that can fire. rule-1 matches the asserted
student fact, but a need-course fact doesn't exist.
rule-2 matches the asserted need-class fact, but the only student fact
doesn't match (the pattern $?c1 ?c $?c2 requires there to be at least
one item in the courses slot to m
Hi,
I have following wme types:
(deftemplate student (slot name) (multislot courses))
(deftemplate class (slot name) (multislot students))
(deftemplate course (slot name) (slot prof))
(do-backward-chaining student)
(do-backward-chaining class)
(do-backward-chaining course)
(assert (student))
(a
Thanks -
Just to share a thought, maybe in addition to (or instead of) "rule
inheritance", a "defmacro" or "defpattern" may be introduced so that
the patterns can be re-used more than once within one rule, which may
not be easily achievable with "rule inheritance".
Xiaocheng
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003
I think Myriam Abramson wrote:
>
> Talking about area. I read that you live in Gathersburg, MD, and work
> for Sandia Labs. How is it possible? I thought Sandia Labs were in New Mexico?
I am a telecommuter. I've collaborated with other government agencies
here in the D.C. area.
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Well, a micro-one. I've talked at a few JUGs in the area here. Nothing
> that requires actual travel.
Talking about area. I read that you live in Gathersburg, MD, and work
for Sandia Labs. How is it possible? I thought Sandia Labs were in New Mexico?
This idea of "rule inheritance" has been brought up before; it's a
good idea. See
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg05152.html .
No promises, but it's possible that it will be in Charlemagne.
Anyway, -don't- deal with this using queries; you'll be sacrificing a
lot of performance f
Hi, this might be a dumb question, but is there any way to reuse
a matching pattern, for example, the following piece of pattern tests
if the class of instance ?x is compatible (subclass, either direction)
with that of instance ?y.
(instance-of ?x ?class1)
(instance-of ?y ?class2)
(or
(
I think Alan Moore wrote:
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Good to see Jess getting wider exposure. Are you going on a speaking tour
> next?
Well, a micro-one. I've talked at a few JUGs in the area here. Nothing
that requires actual travel.
>
> How about a series of "No
Good to see Jess getting wider exposure. Are you going on a speaking tour
next?
How about a series of "No Fluff, Just Jess" conferences ;-D
alan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:55 PM
To: Jess Mailing List
Subject: JES
