Re: JESS: Case Based Reasoning with Rules

2004-02-27 Thread Sionep
I believe that CBR has already been incorporated into CAD software already since the eighties. I have seen my engineer friend using AutoCAD from AutoDesk for retrieving similar design patterns that has been stored in the database. I am no expert in AutoCAD but the user specify design attributes

RE: JESS: Case Based Reasoning with Rules

2004-02-27 Thread Alan Moore
Way back in the day (circa 1990), I worked on the ICADS (now called CADRC) project at CalPoly SLO that did similar things for Architectural design CAD systems. Pretty cool... See: http://www.cadrc.calpoly.edu/ I'm sure this can be done for other domains as well. alan -Original Message-

Re: JESS: Re: experienced users opinions on Jess vs. alternatives

2004-02-27 Thread Udo Dieckmann
I mean stressed it in terms of the complexity of the rules, quantity of rules, and most of all quantity of he fact base, all impinging on how it handles memory at runtime, etc. On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 06:30:16PM -0500, Peder Jakobsen wrote: > Hi Udo, > > You ask an excellent question, but what do

RE: JESS: Case Based Reasoning with Rules

2004-02-27 Thread Jason Morris
Hi Rich, Hybrid (case-based/rule-based) systems are an absolutely fascinating concept, and I have been wondering about their implications and possibilities for some time also. My original interest in expert systems came by way of involvement in developing online performance-support tools for mid-

JESS: Re: experienced users opinions on Jess vs. alternatives

2004-02-27 Thread Peder Jakobsen
Hi Udo, You ask an excellent question, but what do you mean by "stressed it's edges". Do you mean functionally? Peder - Original Message - From: "Udo Dieckmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 3:56 PM Subject: JESS: experienced users opinions

JESS: experienced users opinions on Jess vs. alternatives

2004-02-27 Thread Udo Dieckmann
I'm using Jess currently and would like some experienced comparisons with other commercial offerings of rule engines (like ILog, Haley, Fair Isaac, etc.). How, in your opinion, does Jess "measure up" for industrial-strength applications? If you have experience with other offerings and are using J

Re: JESS: Case Based Reasoning with Rules

2004-02-27 Thread Dusan Sormaz
I did implement small example in cbr for rotational components (based on couple of papers by other authors). Java classes store data, and JESS reasons on cases. I think that match is very natural, JESS has generic cases for facts, where all similarity, search is done in cases (Java objects). Rule

Re: JESS: Case Based Reasoning with Rules

2004-02-27 Thread Sionep
I did attempt last year (2003) in trying to incorporate CBR into JESS but I got so busy with my other stuff and I did abandon the effort. I intend to resume my effort in combining JESS+CBR at some later stage. However , this is not new and it has been done in academic and industry. I have seen on

JESS: Case Based Reasoning with Rules

2004-02-27 Thread Rich Halsey
Hi All,   I have been thinking about Case Based Reasoning (CBR) and it would seem that if a rule-based system could (1) determine which objects it was matching on, (2) use Java reflection to list the object methods used for the predicates, and (3) retrieve within some repository all the obje