On Nov 5, 2008, at 3:38 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
But the interesting question is: does this difference in behavior
imply that there is some difference in efficiency between these
matches?
Yes, actually. The goal is that eventually Jess will transform all
three of these into the exact same R
No, I understand that. It's just that what I've currently done hasn't
needed anything more than what JESS provides. I am taking a look at
CHR again, and looking to see what's under the hood and what the
capabilities are.
On Nov 5, 2008, at 5:17 AM, Peter Van Weert wrote:
Hal Hildebrand wrote:
Hal Hildebrand wrote:
> I had tried to take a look at CHR early on in my current project, but
> what I realized was that my particular problem wasn't so much handling
> constraints
Don't let the name fool you: CHR may have originally be designed to
solely handler constraints, it has grown to a pow
Below, I'm presenting a problem I ran into while setting up a demo example
and explain my error. At the end, there is a question I'd like to have
answered.
(deftemplate State (slot id)(slot st (type OBJECT))) ;st values from
my class at.laun.ex.StatusSet
(reset) ;-)
(assert (State (id 1)(st (new S
