your interest.
Xiaocheng
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Scott Graham wrote:
> Hi Xiaocheng,
> I would like to try your new version of DAMLJessKB,
> how can I download it?.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Scott
>
> --- Xiaocheng Luan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I
I actually rewrote DAMLJessKB using slots a few weeks ago but didn't
notice significant performance gain. I also wrote a simple tool to
convert DAMLJessKB style facts and rules into slots based facts/rules.
All the DAMLJessKB rules/facts were converted in a second, with the
indentations and comme
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is a limitation, a bug, or just I'm not using
it the right way. In the following example, logical CE has rather
strange behavior - two rules interfere with each other. Any ideas?
Xiaocheng
; group 1, doesn't sound right
;
(reset)
(assert (dep 1))
(defrule dep-
be in Charlemagne.
>
> Anyway, -don't- deal with this using queries; you'll be sacrificing a
> lot of performance for not much clarity. One thing you -could- do
> would be to use a macro processor to pre-process your files, and
> define macros to represent the shared data.
that uses a
run-query is the best way I could think of. Any better ideas?
Thanks!
Xiaocheng Luan
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
, or
when (run) is issued? Even a brute force search would take no more
than a few seconds for this kind of simple rule.
Why it isn't so bad if the rule is loaded before the facts?
The system works with Jess via DAMLJessKB, but I don't see how this
might be a fact
