On Mar 5, 2007, at 2:59 PM, Eithon Cadag wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any way to define logical fact dependencies outside of rules?
There isn't right now, but it's a reasonable thing to want to do, and
in fact, it's been
requested before. I'll see if we can do it for Jess 7.1, which is
being
Hi Win,
Thanks for the response -- yes, I saw the logical CE in the book and
online, but I was hoping there was a way of doing the exact same thing
_outside_ of the rule construct (something like "> (assert (logical
(faucet-open) (water-flowing))) [pardon the butchered syntax]).
- Eithon
Wi
Hi Eithon.
Take a look at the "logical" conditional element in the Jess on-line manual:
"The logical conditional element lets you specify /logical dependencies/
among facts. All the facts asserted on the RHS of a rule become
dependent on the matches to the logicalpatterns on that rule's LHS. I
Hi all,
Is there any way to define logical fact dependencies outside of rules? I
have a system that recursively retrieves information from the Web and
instantiates that information as facts, and want to define logical
dependencies between the information derived from the assertion of other
in
