Thanks for the lead !
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JESS: not CE
I think Zhu, David H. wrote:
> Has the Jess book come out yet? I am so ready to order
I think Zhu, David H. wrote:
> Has the Jess book come out yet? I am so ready to order one.
>
> Thanks
The cover has already gone to the printer, and the pages are going out
now. Should be available within a few weeks. You don't have to wait to
order one, though -- you can pre-order today from am
Has the Jess book come out yet? I am so ready to order one.
Thanks
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JESS: not CE
I think Maxim Tretyak wrote:
> (bind ?item <- (
Thank you very much, Ernest, you hit bull's eye.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JESS: not CE
I think Maxim Tretyak wrote:
> (bind ?item &l
I think Maxim Tretyak wrote:
> (bind ?item <- (assert (car)))
> (bind ?customer <- (assert (Peter)))
> (assert (purchase (item ?item) (customer ?customer)))
>
> Then necessity to chek absence of customers, who was not made some
> purchases, arise.
> What ideas?
>
Let me modify this just a bit s
alf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 6:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JESS: not CE
I think Maxim Tretyak wrote:
> Hi
>
> 1. This is rather suggestion. I am frequently use fact ID as a slot value
to
> refer to fact (looks like foreign key). But in cases when th
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JESS: not CE
I think Maxim Tretyak wrote:
> Hi
>
> 1. This is rather suggestion. I am frequently use fact ID as a slot
value
I think Maxim Tretyak wrote:
> Hi
>
> 1. This is rather suggestion. I am frequently use fact ID as a slot value to
> refer to fact (looks like foreign key). But in cases when there is need to
> check an absence of referred fact I can't do this in LHS due to a "not" CE
> incapacity to binding to a
I think Jelmini Carlo wrote:
>
> The problem I'm experiencing is better shown by the following transcript of
> a Jess session:
Ah, yes, sorry, should have remembered this in my previous reply. Yes,
there's a problem with this in the last few betas. It's already been
reported and fixed. The next r
> > It seems that the following code, proposed as a FORALL equivalent in the
> > manual, doesn't work anymore in versions 6.1b2 nor 6.1b3:
> >
> > Jess> (defrule forall-example
> > (not (and (a ?x) (not (b ?x
> > =>)
> > Jess> (assert (a 1))
> > Jess> (assert (a 2))
> > Jess> (assert (b
I think Jelmini Carlo wrote:
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> It seems that the following code, proposed as a FORALL equivalent in the
> manual, doesn't work anymore in versions 6.1b2 nor 6.1b3:
>
> Jess> (defrule forall-example
> (not (and (a ?x) (not (b ?x
>
Hi Morten,
It should work, but the rule isn't being interpreted correctly;
one Jess routine is failing to realize that the two occurrences of
"?post" refer to the same value. For the time being, if you need to
match on a fact binding, use an explicit function call to do it:
(not (postdiction
12 matches
Mail list logo
