contributing to turbine

i wonder why i never saw a post on the turbine list to extend the ressource service .. instead an extendend version is part of jetspeed :-( ok, the service has been removed in 2.3 ... i'm not sure, if commons-config has all the needed functionality .. but let's add it to commons-dev instead of

[patch] for issue 22849

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22849 this patch avoid usage of deprectaed turbine-2.2 methods i tried to add it as attachement in bugzilla with no luck .. so i send it to the list .. martin Index: org/apache/jetspeed/capability/TestCapabilityMap.java =

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-jetspeed/lib village-1.5.3.jar

i ported the patch to village-2.0 .. so you can switch to the latest version now :-) http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/village/jars/village-2.0-dev-20030625.jar martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: taylor 2003/05/29 11:03:39 Modified:lib village-1.5.3.jar Log: updated village jar to fi

[patch] upgrade to torque-3.0.1 now with patch ;-)

to upgrade to torque 3.0.1 please commit the attached patch torque 3.0.1 is a bugfix release ... for a full list of changes see http://db.apache.org/torque/torque-301/changes-report.html martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

[patch] upgrade to torque-3.0.1

to upgrade to torque 3.0.1 please commit the attached patch torque 3.0.1 is a bugfix release ... for a full list of changes see http://db.apache.org/torque/torque-301/changes-report.html martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

[patch] fix dependencies for maven build

with this patch it's possibe to build the jar with maven ... next step is to enable torque generation ... there are 2 ways to do this: * using ant and build-torque.xml * using the torque plugin which way should we go?? martin Index: project.xml =

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-jetspeed

Jason van Zyl wrote: This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml clean: [copy] Copying 1

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15214] - Cleanup Logging

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think 2.3 is anytime too soon. I do think that the Turbine developers learned from T2.2 that keeping something in beta for a year leads to unhappy users, and a nightmare job on doing the release. The release of T2.2 was a herculean effort (mostly because of deco

Re: Upgrading to Latest Jars

David Sean Taylor wrote: > I'd like to upgrade to the latest versions of : > > Torque > Turbine > Stratum > Fulcrum > > I checked out all four projects from cvs head, built them and then modified > Jetspeed to bring it up-to-date. > Ran unit tests, everything seems to be working against Hyperson

Re: turbine-2.2-b3

David Sean Taylor wrote: > Did you have to modify any jetspeed source? yes .. i'll send the patches to your private mail ... martin > > >>-Original Message- >>From: Martin Poeschl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:39 A

Re: turbine-2.2-b3

David Sean Taylor wrote: >>if you need any changes in torque .. why don't you send patches >>to the turbine-torque-dev list??? > > > Thats a brilliant idea!!! ;-) > Better yet, I can just commit it myself. :-)) > > But I would imagine that the latest version of Torque has this patch in it > by

Re: turbine-2.2-b3

if you need any changes in torque .. why don't you send patches to the turbine-torque-dev list??? martin David Sean Taylor wrote: > Lookin at torque, and why the hell isn't this (f*) class public? > I went thru every class in Jetspeed, yet we never use Torque criteria for > anything but the def

Re: jetspeed and turbine 2.2

e can discuss the movement to turbine 2.2 after your release martin > > David > > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Poeschl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 5:26 AM > Subject: jetspeed and tur

jetspeed and turbine 2.2

i'm working on a turbine 2.2 release (b2 planned for today .. maybe tomorrow ;-) there are some big changes: the coupled torque has been removed the api of the decoupled torque changed (using List instead of Vector) so i thought it would be godd to see how much work it is to move an app like je

Re: turbine and ojb

David Sean Taylor wrote: >>i saw some ojb stuff was checked in to the jetspeed repo. > > > OJB worked fairly well for persisting the Jetspeed registry. > I think it would've been a lot more difficult with Torque/Peers. > Id prefer to do all Jetspeed persistence with JDO. > I know OJB has plans i

turbine and ojb

i saw some ojb stuff was checked in to the jetspeed repo. we (zenplex) will use ojb together with turbine in the near future, so i'm working on a turbine integration. there will be a ojb component so it will be possible to use ojb like any other component (e.g. torque) i'm also writing a gene

Re: I propose to upgrade Turbine again - eez ok?

Chris Kimpton wrote: > Hi, > > >>>I will probably not touch the torque stuff, as I have not had >> >>time to >> >>>try the latest torque code - to see how to startup the torque >>>service... - I will just make sure the current stuff still works >> >>with >> >>>the new jar(s). >> >>if want to use

Re: I propose to upgrade Turbine again - eez ok?

Chris Kimpton wrote: > Hi, > > There has been a fix to the overriding localisation feature that I > upgraded turbine for the last time. > > I am currently testing with the new turbine at the moment - anyone > got any concerns about me upgrading turbine... > > I will probably not touch the torqu

Re: Can I update turbine jar to the latest version from cvs?

torque in turbine 2.x is deprecated. you should use the decoupled version .. i'll send a patch tomorrow :-) (it's 3am and i need some sleep now) martin David Sean Taylor wrote: > Make sure that torque still works > > Cd /build/torque > > ant > > Are you upgrading the Velocity jar also?

Re: Informal Meeting @ Collab

Santiago Gala wrote: > David Sean Taylor wrote: > > > > >> >> For those of you who can't make it, if you'd like to send me a list of >> questions/issues, I'd be glad to relay your questions at the meeting. >> > > I would like to know about the evolution of the security stuff in > Turbine.

Re: update site (was: Final Release 1.3a2)

David Sean Taylor wrote: > Martin, > > Can you try to incorporate the included file into news.xml? > I can't seem to get it to build, its complaining about an incompatible > signature. > Should I be posting the announcement anywhere else? (This is only an alpha > release) ther are alpha and be

Re: update site (was: Final Release 1.3a2)

David Sean Taylor wrote: > Martin, > > Yup, I've got insufficient karma: > > Access denied: Insufficient Karma (taylor|jakarta-site2/xdocs/site) > > hell, and I thought I had too much of that stuff going on lately! > > Could you please update xdocs/site/binindex.xml? > The diff is inclu

update site (was: Final Release 1.3a2)

David Sean Taylor wrote: > First of all, sorry about sending the announcement emails out as HTML email. > Im out of the office and using a company computer, and didn't realize the > mail settings until I received the mail this morning. > > >>1) General release announcement ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >