Johnny Cass wrote:
> Santiago Gala wrote:
>
>>Santiago Gala wrote
>>
>>
>>>Thanks for your great job, John. I think we are getting a new committer
>>>
>>---> obviously I meant Johnny. Sorry about this one :(
>>
>>
>
> Hey, it could have been worse. If you omitted the 'h' someone might have
> mi
] http://www.qg.com
-
> -Original Message-
> From: Johnny Cass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 3:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Build system ( wa
Santiago Gala wrote:
>
> Santiago Gala wrote
>
> > Thanks for your great job, John. I think we are getting a new committer
>
> ---> obviously I meant Johnny. Sorry about this one :(
>
Hey, it could have been worse. If you omitted the 'h' someone might have
mistaken me for Jon. ;-). Just kiddi
Santiago Gala wrote
> Thanks for your great job, John. I think we are getting a new committer
---> obviously I meant Johnny. Sorry about this one :(
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
Johnny Cass wrote:
> "Brekke, Jeff" wrote:
>
>>+1 to removal. All projects seem to be moving in this direction.
>>
>
> I would like to see this happen, but agree with Raphael and Santiago. It
> might be a bit premature to drop the scripts right now. The new build
> system works like it used to
"Brekke, Jeff" wrote:
>
> +1 to removal. All projects seem to be moving in this direction.
I would like to see this happen, but agree with Raphael and Santiago. It
might be a bit premature to drop the scripts right now. The new build
system works like it used to without requiring Ant to be inst
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Build system ( was: TODO updated )
>
>
> Raphaël Luta wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Johnny Cass wrote:
> > >
> > > 4.) Finally, if the turbine folk are g
Johnny Cass wrote:
> Raphaël Luta wrote:
>
>>
>>>Johnny Cass wrote:
>>>
>>>4.) Finally, if the turbine folk are going forward with removing the
>>>build scripts, should we do the same? I'll do this as well.
>>>
>>>
>>I'm +0 on this: on one hand, it makes it easier for the developpers because
>>y
Johnny Cass wrote:
>
> Raphaël Luta wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Johnny Cass wrote:
> > >
> > > 4.) Finally, if the turbine folk are going forward with removing the
> > > build scripts, should we do the same? I'll do this as well.
> > >
> >
> > I'm +0 on this: on one hand, it makes it easier for the deve
Raphaël Luta wrote:
>
>
> > Johnny Cass wrote:
> >
> > 4.) Finally, if the turbine folk are going forward with removing the
> > build scripts, should we do the same? I'll do this as well.
> >
>
> I'm +0 on this: on one hand, it makes it easier for the developpers because
> you don't need to ha
10 matches
Mail list logo
