Since 1.4b4 contains quitte some bugs that have been fixed, I recommend
switching to 1.4 final while waiting for 1.5...
-Stijn
- Original Message -
From: Archana Turaga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: Security questions
On Tuesday, February 17, 2004, at 06:48 AM, Mikhail Garber wrote:
Thus you can 'group' collections of users together in order to apply
security constraints to those users. For example, you could create a
constraint that granted view and
customize access to all users in group 'A', but only view
Thanks for the info. Although i think this is not valid in 1.4b4 which is what i'm
using. Based on the e-mail that you sent today it seems as if this information is
incorporated into 1.5. But 1.5 is not a official release yet...i hope it becomes
official pretty soon.
In that case if we are
On Tuesday, February 17, 2004, at 11:42 AM, Archana Turaga wrote:
Thanks for the info. Although i think this is not valid in 1.4b4 which
is what i'm using. Based on the e-mail that you sent today it seems as
if this information is incorporated into 1.5. But 1.5 is not a
official release
On Saturday, February 14, 2004, at 05:44 PM, Archana Turaga wrote:
Hi,
The following questions:
1. What is the purpose of groups in jetspeed? Just like Role-based
PSML is there group-based PSML?
Groups represent a collection of users much in the same way groups are
used in operating systems.
anybody point me where actually I am doing the mistake.
Thanks regards,
Prasad.
-Original Message-
From: David Sean Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 16 February, 2004 12:06
To: Jetspeed Users List
Subject: Re: Security questions
On Saturday, February 14, 2004, at 05:44 PM
: Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jetspeed Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: Security questions?
David,
The tag security-ref parent=abx references the security-entry
name=abx in the registry. In addition the security-ref does not
define the rules
David wrote:
Paul, Then the security-entry really does represent a rule.
Correct.
Another question, in the registry config files that come with the current
build the portlet entries have both a security role=??/ entry and a
security-ref parent=?? entry. I would have thought the role
David,
See below.
David wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a good understanding of the new security model.
I've read the security proposal (several times) and I've been
perusing the configuration files. There are a couple of things I'm
not clear on. These are the things that are
might be:
If Role = User or Role = Guest Then
Allow Action = View
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jetspeed Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: Security questions?
David,
See below.
David wrote:
Hi
an example might be:
If Role = User or Role = Guest Then
Allow Action = View
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jetspeed Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: Security questions?
David,
See below
11 matches
Mail list logo
