Re: Portlets and stateful protocol

2006-01-26 Thread Michael Gustav Simon
aaron, many thanks for this great hint!

Re: Portlets and stateful protocol

2006-01-26 Thread Aaron Evans
Michael Gustav Simon gmail.com> writes: > > Have anyone an ideo to get a portletinstance per user? > Michael, you *really* would not want this. This approach would never scale and this is exactly why there is only one portlet instance per VM (actually, this isn't quite correct, as you can co

Re: Portlets and stateful protocol

2006-01-25 Thread Michael Gustav Simon
Have anyone an ideo to get a portletinstance per user? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Portlets and stateful protocol

2006-01-25 Thread Michael Gustav Simon
But if this portlet needs a peer to peer connection to the backend for this service, i have one portlet instance in the vm only?

Re: Portlets and stateful protocol

2006-01-24 Thread Philip Mark Donaghy
On 1/24/06, Michael Gustav Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo j2-Users, > a portlet is presented in the vm once (singleton). > HTTP is stateless, singleton is a good idea, but ... > How do I can realize a portlet, if i need a stateful protocol like for a > chat? Hi, I guess that you might ne

Portlets and stateful protocol

2006-01-24 Thread Michael Gustav Simon
Hallo j2-Users, a portlet is presented in the vm once (singleton). HTTP is stateless, singleton is a good idea, but ... How do I can realize a portlet, if i need a stateful protocol like for a chat? mgsimon