Re: [jffnms-users] Empty graphs

2005-04-07 Thread Eduardo Fernández
Weird, from the output it seems jffnms needs rw access to snmp to retrieve info about the interfaces, but in theory ro access is enough. I've tried with snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost ifTable and it's reporting correctly. Maybe the problem is on jffnms, I'm using 0.8.1. Best regards, Eduardo O

Re: [jffnms-users] configuring interfaces and oid's

2005-04-07 Thread Javier Szyszlican
Hi John, You can use the snmp_counter poller for simple OIDs. You should create a new Poller Item using the snmp_counter function. But you still need to create an interface type, a discovery script, graphs, etc. Javier John Logsdon wrote: As I stated in an earlier request, I know just enough about

[jffnms-users] configuring interfaces and oid's

2005-04-07 Thread John Logsdon
As I stated in an earlier request, I know just enough about nms to be dangerous. I now have oid's that I want to monitor. Do I have to write a new poller to start graphing these? Can I plug them in to the generic poller? In either case, where and how do I place these oid's? Thanks, John Logsd

Re: [jffnms-users] SNMP trap receivers (2nd try)

2005-04-07 Thread Javier Szyszlican
Erno, static receiver: - Alarm state is user (parameter) defined in the static receiver (that's why i named it 'static'). Interface and interface_id will be empty if there is no match. Ok. Snmp_table_discovery: - I don't seem to find the snmp_table discovery

Re: [jffnms-users] SNMP trap receivers (2nd try)

2005-04-07 Thread Javier Szyszlican
Erno, static receiver: - Alarm state is user (parameter) defined in the static receiver (that's why i named it 'static'). Interface and interface_id will be empty if there is no match. Ok. Snmp_table_discovery: - I don't seem to find the snmp_table discovery

Re: [jffnms-users] SNMP trap receivers (2nd try)

2005-04-07 Thread Erno Rigo
On Thursday 07 April 2005 00.49, Javier Szyszlican wrote: Hello! > Hi Erno, > > Trap Consolidator: > --- > > The Regexp matching of the OID should be done in the trap_consolidator not > inside each receiver,if it matches you run the receiver, if it doesn't you > dont. Done. > Yo