RE: [jffnms-users] Changes in pollers snmp_counter / snmp_status

2005-09-22 Thread LIMA David
I have now understand what you said Javier and Craig: if we clean we can brake something (even in my opinion snmp_counter count and snmp_get from libs can get strings), I will try to do a regexp poller but I will first finish my blade interface type that use my poller. Any clue why snmp_status

RE: [jffnms-users] Changes in pollers snmp_counter / snmp_status

2005-09-22 Thread LIMA David
1) Snmp_status I've tested the snmp status with the string before to post my message but it always returns down state. Don't know if I do something wrong... The snmp get outputs: "1 - power module is good" (note that the " are inside my string.) I tested different scenarios like: "1 - power mod

Re: [jffnms-users] Changes in pollers snmp_counter / snmp_status

2005-09-22 Thread Javier Szyszlican
David, I agree with Craig in snmp_status. On the snmp_counter, Craig is right that we may need a regexp_poller at some point. But I also think that snmp_counter should only return numbers, the problem is that other interface types may be expecting the full string out of snmp_counter, so I'm

Re: [jffnms-users] setting up a satellite

2005-09-22 Thread Javier Szyszlican
Hi, I'm afraid Satellites don't work as expected, I never had the time to make them work. Sorry, Javier Greg Albrecht wrote: hi, i'm trying to setup two systems at two different sites, the idea behind this is that they're being setup to monitor two distinct networks that don't interconnect