Re: [jffnms-users] Poller output doesn't seem to match rrd file

2008-03-12 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 05:08:06PM -0500, Joe Wells wrote: > Yup, it's a counter. I'm re-doing it as gauge to see what happens. Looks > better already, though. > > I thought that this would be a counter, and the JFFNMS docs list it as a > counter. ICMP messages should be a counter. You don't care

Re: [jffnms-users] using strace to troubleshoot high CPU

2008-03-12 Thread Craig Small
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:31:18PM -0400, ... wrote: > Hi > Here is some more on that EAGAIN error; Without knowing what filedescriptor 7 is, it kinda makes it not that useful. > Here is the output of that other command I was asked to run; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ls -l /proc/3422/fd/7 > lr-x--

Re: [jffnms-users] using strace to troubleshoot high CPU

2008-03-12 Thread . . .
Hi Here is some more on that EAGAIN error; access("/opt/jffnms/rrd/interface-11379-8.rrd", F_OK) = 0 write(6, "update \'/opt/jffnms/rrd/interfac"..., 57) = 57 fcntl64(7, F_GETFL) = 0x800 (flags O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) fcntl64(7, F_SETFL, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) = 0 nanosleep({0, 1000

Re: [jffnms-users] using strace to troubleshoot high CPU

2008-03-12 Thread LIMA David
Hi, i notice same problem on a huge installation (about 1000 host and 15 000 interfaces). Try to figure out what cause the File Decriptor 7 to EAGAIN, if it is rrdtool, you have to use rrdtool 1.3 beta and tune some things on your disk. (use a separate block device for your rrd folder, reduce th