Re: [jffnms-users] Cisco temperature graphing

2005-05-12 Thread falz
Thanks, Which line in the output from the 2600 revealed this? It all looks like jumbled numbers to me :) --falz On 5/12/05, Javier Szyszlican <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was right then, the 2600 and 3600 do NOT have a temperature sensor, their > IOS > just reports as having one. You can ask C

Re: [jffnms-users] Cisco temperature graphing

2005-05-12 Thread Javier Szyszlican
I was right then, the 2600 and 3600 do NOT have a temperature sensor, their IOS just reports as having one. You can ask Cisco about this. Javier falz wrote: Hi Falz, falz wrote: However, on every 1600, 2600 and 3600 I set to monitor temperature, the same thing seems to happen. Graph is always bla

Re: [jffnms-users] Cisco temperature graphing

2005-05-12 Thread falz
> Hi Falz, > falz wrote: > > However, on every 1600, 2600 and 3600 I set to monitor temperature, > > the same thing seems to happen. Graph is always blank, it DOES create > > the rrd, but the timestamp on the rrd never changes, so after the > > first creation, jffnms/rrdtool never successfully upda

Re: [jffnms-users] Cisco temperature graphing

2005-05-11 Thread Javier Szyszlican
Hi Falz, falz wrote: > Hello, > > First off, I just upgraded to .0.8.2, all working well. There should > be something in the UPGRADE doc that states that the "files/*" > directory doesn't exist all of the time, because it hasn't the last > few upgrades. Would save some confusion. (either that or

[jffnms-users] Cisco temperature graphing

2005-05-11 Thread falz
Hello, First off, I just upgraded to .0.8.2, all working well. There should be something in the UPGRADE doc that states that the "files/*" directory doesn't exist all of the time, because it hasn't the last few upgrades. Would save some confusion. (either that or the files/ dir is missing from the