Re: [jffnms-users] Issues monitoring FreeBSD servers

2005-12-29 Thread falz
On 12/29/05, Tim Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, my SNMP config works just fine. I am able to snmpwalk the MIB tree > just fine and see proper values for network interfaces, CPU, memory, etc... Perhaps something got mangled during your install. Also, are you choosing SNMPv1 when you add h

Re: [jffnms-users] Issues monitoring FreeBSD servers

2005-12-29 Thread Tim Nelson
Yes, my SNMP config works just fine. I am able to snmpwalk the MIB tree just fine and see proper values for network interfaces, CPU, memory, etc... Tim Nelson Utaria Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] falz wrote: I've got JFF monitoring 50ish FreeBSD servers that are 3.x, 4.x, 5.x, and

Re: [jffnms-users] Issues monitoring FreeBSD servers

2005-12-27 Thread falz
I've got JFF monitoring 50ish FreeBSD servers that are 3.x, 4.x, 5.x, and 6.0, all work fine. In most cases, net-snmp from ports. Does your SNMP config work in general? My FreeBSD installs show CPU, memory, disk, ethernet, etc. Everything I need it to monitor, essentially. --falz On 12/27/05, Tim

[jffnms-users] Issues monitoring FreeBSD servers

2005-12-27 Thread Tim Nelson
I am trying to get JFFNMS to show CPU usage, loads, memory usage, bandwidth usage, etc... on a large number of FreeBSD servers. Each of the servers are running either FreeBSD 5.4 or 4.11 with Net-SNMP 5.2.1 installed via Ports. When discovery is run, I am only able to see "Cisco NAT" as an avai