ny reason you set the default to .5? I would suggest we
> tune it to half of the polling cycle (150).
>
> Min
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Javier Szyszlican [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 9:59 AM
> To: JFFNMS Mail List
> Subject: Re:
ault to .5? I would
> suggest we tune it to half of the polling cycle (150).
>
> Min
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Javier Szyszlican [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 9:59 AM
> To: JFFNMS Mail List
> Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] still gap
, default now())
Min
-Original Message-
From: Min Qiu
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 11:45 AM
To: JFFNMS Mail List
Subject: RE: [jffnms-users] still gaps in graphs...
If poller.php do not drop any packet/result, no matter how busy the box
is, eventaully, it will finish its polling cycle and
Szyszlican [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 9:59 AM
To: JFFNMS Mail List
Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] still gaps in graphs...
Hi,
Well, if you have a lot of 30! then you will have gaps in the graphs!
Load should remain under 1 or 2.
The number of threads is ok for a installation
gt;>
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Javier Szyszlican [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 12:03 PM
>>Cc: jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] still gaps in graphs...
>>
>>If you modified
d I go about 'doing it by hand'? Thanks
>
>--
>
>Jason
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Javier Szyszlican [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 12:03 PM
>Cc: jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] st
How would I go about 'doing it by hand'? Thanks
--
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Javier Szyszlican [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 12:03 PM
Cc: jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] still gaps in graphs...
If you modi
Anybody?
--
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Javier Szyszlican [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:54 AM
Cc: jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] still gaps in graphs...
Hi Jason,
I've just released 0.8.1-pre1, could you test it, I think it wil
, March 01, 2005 8:54 AM
Cc: jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] still gaps in graphs...
Hi Jason,
I've just released 0.8.1-pre1, could you test it, I think it will fix your
problem.
Its just a code upgrade, no DB changes, so it will be easy to upgrade to
0.8.1
fnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] still gaps in graphs...
Hi Jason,
I recently found some bugs in the new poller launcher code, that is
triggered
when you have a lot of hosts.
How many do you have?
For 200 hosts, I ran 30 threads and it worked perfectly.
Javier
Jason Humes wrote:
Hi
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 12:39 PM
Cc: jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] still gaps in graphs...
Hi Jason,
I recently found some bugs in the new poller launcher code, that is
triggered
when you have a lot of hosts.
How many do you have?
For 200 hosts, I ran 30 th
Hi Jason,
I recently found some bugs in the new poller launcher code, that is triggered
when you have a lot of hosts.
How many do you have?
For 200 hosts, I ran 30 threads and it worked perfectly.
Javier
Jason Humes wrote:
Hi
So, since we've upgraded to 0.8.0 we've been getting gaps in our graphs
Title: still gaps in graphs...
Hi
So, since we've upgraded to 0.8.0 we've been getting gaps in our graphs (all of them). Javier suggested that I increase the pollers count, which I've done...its been set to 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and at all those settings, I still get gapsany ideas? Thanks
13 matches
Mail list logo
