Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's InternetAccess]

1999-03-22 Thread Harry Bassler
Let's hear it for JAWS! Harry -Original Message- From: Ginny Quick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, March 22, 1999 11:46 AM Subject: RE: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's InternetAccess]

RE: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's InternetAccess]

1999-03-22 Thread Clive Lansink
AIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 12:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's InternetAccess] Hi David, Keep in mind that as a new release of a screen reader comes out, it may leap frog the competition for a while. Let

RE: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's InternetAccess]

1999-03-22 Thread Ginny Quick
performs >>WindowEyes. Think about braille for instance. I think, stick with JFW in >>the meantime. >> >>CJL >> >>-Original Message- >>From: Les Kriegler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 12:23 AM >>To: [EMAIL PR

Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's InternetAccess]

1999-03-22 Thread Simon F
if MS are going to make a screen reader then it better be able to do everything that JFW can, I'm not stepping backwards in the computer world. simonAt 05:07 21/03/99 -0800, you wrote: >I would bet that Microsoft will develop a screen reader. Not for the blind >community but for other areas that

RE: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's InternetAccess]

1999-03-22 Thread Kelly Ford
performs >WindowEyes. Think about braille for instance. I think, stick with JFW in >the meantime. > >CJL > >-Original Message- >From: Les Kriegler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 12:23 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Fwd: Fwd

Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's InternetAccess]

1999-03-21 Thread chris cant
Hi there Gord, I agree, this is the problem! if they put there toes in to developing a screen reader that is bought with the cd of windows on it then goodness nos what will happen! you will have a screen reader but its oporation for us will be not taken in to acount, they will give you access bu

Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's InternetAccess]

1999-03-21 Thread Les Kriegler
Hi David, Keep in mind that as a new release of a screen reader comes out, it may leap frog the competition for a while. Let's see how well JFW 3.3 works with IE5, and then I think some conclusions can be drawn. This isn't taking anything away from Window-Eyes; it's great that it apparently wor

Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's InternetAccess]

1999-03-21 Thread David Poehlman
we needn't worry about ms developing an effective screen reader. we are all going to march to lynux soon and ms couldn't fight their way out of a wet screen reader paper bag. -- Hands-On Technolog(eye)s Touching The Internet: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: 301.949.7599 ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/p

Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's InternetAccess]

1999-03-21 Thread Michael Seelig
I would bet that Microsoft will develop a screen reader. Not for the blind community but for other areas that will develop into it. One of the quiet reasons for the development of all the software synthesizers etc. is so that ultimately a company's web site can be integrated into more sophisticate

Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's InternetAccess]

1999-03-21 Thread Lynn Schneider
I think it is important to point out in this discussion that, like the rest of the computer industry, screen readers are always changing and developing. I'm sure HJ will catch up quickly with Window-Eyes and IE5. As we all know, GW Micro fell behind in the IE race there for a while and are now ca

Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's InternetAccess]

1999-03-21 Thread David Scrimenti
These are exactly the kinds of features we need in JFW. Unfortunately, when I had to buy a screen reader, Window Eyes was way behind JFW. Now it seems like they're ahead. I don't want to slo progress at HJ but these screen readers are so damn expensive that I'll stick with the one I have until som

Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's InternetAccess]

1999-03-21 Thread Gordon Kent
Hey guys: do you really think that microsoft is going to dedicate any serious resources into developing a superior screen reader. Look how long its taken to get MSAA in to a reputable state, and it still isn't implemented by most of the software out there. I doubt that a microsoft screenreader i

Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's InternetAccess]

1999-03-20 Thread Charles Lott
When it comes to the future, both JFW and Window-eyes (as well as any other third-party screen readers out there) had better be looking over their shoulder. Microsoft is reported to be working on its own screen readers for Windows products. If and when they succeed, the scheisse will hit the