Ok,
yes, I read too quickly your reply, I will keep the check and throw an OOME
On 13 Jul 2015, at 13:10, David Holmes wrote:
> On 13/07/2015 8:09 PM, Jean-Francois Denise wrote:
>> In the Java code, I understand that it is useless, an OOM will be thrown.
>
> No, an OOM _may_ be thrown. That is
On 13/07/2015 8:09 PM, Jean-Francois Denise wrote:
In the Java code, I understand that it is useless, an OOM will be thrown.
No, an OOM _may_ be thrown. That is what I said below - you still need
the null check based on the JNI spec (as opposed to the hotspot VM).
David
JF
On 13 Jul 2015,
The updated fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jfdenise/JDK-8130344-2/
On 13 Jul 2015, at 12:09, Jean-Francois Denise
wrote:
> In the Java code, I understand that it is useless, an OOM will be thrown.
> JF
> On 13 Jul 2015, at 11:16, David Holmes wrote:
>
>> On 13/07/2015 6:06 PM, Jean-Francois
In the Java code, I understand that it is useless, an OOM will be thrown.
JF
On 13 Jul 2015, at 11:16, David Holmes wrote:
> On 13/07/2015 6:06 PM, Jean-Francois Denise wrote:
>> Thank you,
>> I am removing the null check and throw.
>
> Why are you removing them ??
>
> David
>
>> JF
>>
>> On
On 13/07/2015 6:06 PM, Jean-Francois Denise wrote:
Thank you,
I am removing the null check and throw.
Why are you removing them ??
David
JF
On 13 Jul 2015, at 08:06, David Holmes wrote:
On 11/07/2015 2:45 AM, Jean-Francois Denise wrote:
Thanks Alan,
I had read the spec from
https://doc
Thank you,
I am removing the null check and throw.
JF
On 13 Jul 2015, at 08:06, David Holmes wrote:
> On 11/07/2015 2:45 AM, Jean-Francois Denise wrote:
>> Thanks Alan,
>> I had read the spec from
>> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/jni/spec/functions.html#array_operations
