Re: [SPAM?] Re: Encapsulating internal APIs in JDK 9 (sun.misc.Unsafe, etc.)

2015-08-05 Thread mark . reinhold
2015/8/5 3:29 -0700, Simon Nash : > mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: >> I understand the problem you're solving, but the difficulty with this >> as a category is that it arguably includes every internal class, even >> those never intended to be even internal APIs, since pretty much any >> internal c

Re: [SPAM?] Re: Encapsulating internal APIs in JDK 9 (sun.misc.Unsafe, etc.)

2015-08-05 Thread Simon Nash
mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: 2015/8/4 12:07 -0700, Simon Nash : mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: 2015/8/4 11:34 -0700, si...@cjnash.com: Thanks for this. In the list of broad categories, one is missing: x Those which are required to enable application code to work around bugs in the JDK s