Changeset: 64d52c3bf9e2
Author:alanb
Date: 2016-01-16 07:54 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jdk/rev/64d52c3bf9e2
Drop qualified exports to jdk.deploy.osx
! src/java.base/macosx/classes/module-info.java.extra
Winding up this discussion ...
While the use of a properties file to provide a mapping from module name
to file system artifact has some attractive properties, it seems that
there is insufficient interest to pursue it further at this time. We can
always revisit it later. The same applies to va
Changeset: ac4cbad574a2
Author:jlahoda
Date: 2016-01-15 23:41 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/rev/ac4cbad574a2
Use jrt-fs forwarding to implement -system(modulepath) when jrt-fs is available
on the platform.
! src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tool
Sorry for the late response! Looks like I need to pay attention to the
jigsaw alias from now on :-)
On 1/12/2016 12:10 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 11/01/2016 03:02, Frank Yuan wrote:
Hi Alan and Joe
Would you like to have a review for test task
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-807882
Sorry for the late response! Looks like I need to pay attention to the
jigsaw alias from now on :-)
On 1/12/2016 12:10 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 11/01/2016 03:02, Frank Yuan wrote:
Hi Alan and Joe
Would you like to have a review for test task
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-807882
Hi Paul,
no, I'm not talking about multiple versions of the same module, that
subject is clear to me.
Alan described quite precise my issue (it's the first described usecase,
although the others are interesting as well). So it seems that if two
different modules export the same package, the
Robert, in the SOTM document, it explicitly calls out that Module systems
are not required to support multiple versions of a module. Correct me if
wrong, but I think you're hinting at that?
Cheers,
Paul
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Robert Scholte
wrote:
> Op Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:45:32 +0100
On 15/01/2016 09:06, Robert Scholte wrote:
Suppose there's a logging module and a fat module, which also contains
the classes of the logging module, but older.
In my module-info I have
requires logging;
requires fat;
These modules are in the same directory. Which class is loaded first
Op Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:45:32 +0100 schreef Jonathan Gibbons
:
On 01/14/2016 12:25 PM, e...@zusammenkunft.net wrote:
Hello,
If I understood it correctly the modules on the MP must be unique and
are not merged, thats why the order inside the directory does not
matter for the named module
