Hi,
Could you be so kind to take a look on this fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shurailine/8154182/webrev.00/
Thank you.
Shura
On 4/13/2016 9:05 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
What I would prefer though is a proper generic way to call a default
method on an interface without having an implementing instance. A
MethodHandles.lookup().in(Comperator.class) won't give me access to
invokespecial Comperator#reversed, or am I wrong
On 4/13/2016 5:55 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 11/04/2016 02:39, Frank Yuan wrote:
Hi Alan and Joe
Would you like to have a look at this review
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyuan/8078820/webrev.01/ ?
I skimmed through the tests and they are testing the right scenarios.
I assume you'll work
On 13.04.2016 14:10, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 11/04/2016 16:57, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
[...]
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.InterfaceConversionTest >
testDefaultInterfaceMethodCallOnProxy FAILED
java.lang.AssertionError: java.util.Comparator/2
at
java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles$Lookup.
javac uses 3 buffers concurrently even without compression. These seem to be
legit (allocated and released properly.)
> On Apr 13, 2016, at 10:23 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
>
> On 13/04/2016 14:18, Jim Laskey (Oracle) wrote:
>> Yes, needed for decompression.
>>
> So how many are in use-case?
+1
> On 08 Apr 2016, at 19:05, Jim Laskey (Oracle) wrote:
>
> The code was reworked to use jrtfs: instead of reading from javafx.jar.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlaskey/8075550/webrev/index.html
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075550
>
>
>
On 13/04/2016 14:18, Jim Laskey (Oracle) wrote:
Yes, needed for decompression.
So how many are in use-case? I'm just wondering if ImageBufferCache
actually needs to cache >1 buffer.
-Alan
+1
-Sundar
On 4/13/2016 6:45 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 11/04/2016 14:37, Jim Laskey (Oracle) wrote:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlaskey/8151807/webrev/index.html
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151807
> This looks quite although I'm wondering if there are cases where we
> need
Yes, needed for decompression.
> On Apr 13, 2016, at 10:15 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> On 11/04/2016 14:37, Jim Laskey (Oracle) wrote:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlaskey/8151807/webrev/index.html
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151807
> This looks quite although I'm wondering if
On 11/04/2016 14:37, Jim Laskey (Oracle) wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlaskey/8151807/webrev/index.html
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151807
This looks quite although I'm wondering if there are cases where we need
up to 3 buffers. Is it in the decompress code? I'm just wonderin
On 11/04/2016 02:39, Frank Yuan wrote:
Hi Alan and Joe
Would you like to have a look at this review
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyuan/8078820/webrev.01/ ?
I skimmed through the tests and they are testing the right scenarios.
I assume you'll work with Joe to get this into jdk9/dev/jaxp.
-A
On 11/04/2016 16:57, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
:
Can it be registered via registerDriver? That actually made me wonder
why exactly we require the system loader here in the first place.
Part of the problem is DriverManager#getConnection, which is
@CallerSensitive. So if I want to get a connecti
Changeset: bd25ac71c3b7
Author:alanb
Date: 2016-04-13 11:29 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/corba/rev/bd25ac71c3b7
Tempoary fix for idlj issue JDK-8153894
!
src/java.corba/share/classes/com/sun/tools/corba/se/idl/som/cff/FileLocator.java
On 13/04/2016 10:26, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
:
Wait, I confused myself with multiple JDK builds here. This actually
works in JDK 9b113:
Class vmClass = ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader()
.loadClass("com.sun.tools.attach.VirtualMachine");
Therefore, we are fine at the mo
On 04/13/2016 12:08 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> OpenJDK JOL is using Attach API to get the access to Instrumentation
> instance without forcing user to -javaagent: the JAR. I think ByteBuddy
> is using similar mechanism.
>
> How is one supposed to use Attach API these post-Jigsaw days?
>
> Befo
Hi,
OpenJDK JOL is using Attach API to get the access to Instrumentation
instance without forcing user to -javaagent: the JAR. I think ByteBuddy
is using similar mechanism.
How is one supposed to use Attach API these post-Jigsaw days?
Before JDK 9, we could poll VirtualMachine from tools.jar, an
16 matches
Mail list logo
