Re: Project JIGSAW does not work

Hi guys! I found the solution for my problem. Maybe this information can be important for other developer. If you desire to run JIGSAW project's examples cod, so you need download open-jdk-9 with jigsaw project: https://jdk9.java.net/jigsaw/. It appears obvious, but I didn't know. Thank you. On

Re: 8156989: Trailing empty element in classpath ignored

On 05/16/2016 12:36 PM, Mandy Chung wrote: >For tests then Jon will be pushing the updated MineField to jdk9/dev soon. We need to go over the new options and get javac and the runtime consistent. I think we want it so that empty elements in the new options are ignored, leaving class path

Re: 8156989: Trailing empty element in classpath ignored

> On May 16, 2016, at 11:53 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: > > > Martin's MineField test has been excluded for some time, one reason is that > it exercised -Xbootclasspath/p and so doesn't work with JDK 9. Jon is > cleaning up this test via JDK-8156989 and lo behold, it

Re: Java 9 build 118 is hiding some documented & public classes from unnamed module

On 16/05/2016 16:19, Uwe Schindler wrote: Thanks Alan, so this means we should better remove the references to the mentioned class from the Apache Solr code if not needed (I don't think we need the Java EE features here, it might be an oversight). I just wonder why Javac succeeded in our

Re: RFR 8156972: java/lang/reflect/Layer/LayerAndLoadersTest.java test requires jdk.compiler

On 16/05/2016 18:28, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote: You are right, Alan. Thank you. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shurailine/8156972/webrev.01/ I have also tried to think of a better message, since it is UOE not and not ISE … but decided it is descriptive enough as it is. I think UOE is

8156989: Trailing empty element in classpath ignored

Martin's MineField test has been excluded for some time, one reason is that it exercised -Xbootclasspath/p and so doesn't work with JDK 9. Jon is cleaning up this test via JDK-8156989 and lo behold, it finds a corner case. The corner case is where the last element of the class is the empty

Re: RFR 8156972: java/lang/reflect/Layer/LayerAndLoadersTest.java test requires jdk.compiler

You are right, Alan. Thank you. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shurailine/8156972/webrev.01/ I have also tried to think of a better message, since it is UOE not and not ISE … but decided it is descriptive enough as it is. Shura > On May 14, 2016, at 8:37 AM, Alan Bateman

RE: Java 9 build 118 is hiding some documented & public classes from unnamed module

Thanks Alan, so this means we should better remove the references to the mentioned class from the Apache Solr code if not needed (I don't think we need the Java EE features here, it might be an oversight). I just wonder why Javac succeeded in our case to build. I have to dig. For now I added

Java 9 build 118 is hiding some documented & public classes from unnamed module

Hi, the Lucene team installed JDK9 build 118 today and this failed our build during some checks. The reason is that some classes are missing from the unnamed module (standard Java 8 classpath-only application). Just try this test: public class Test { public static void main(String... args)

Re: Ping - Re: RFR 8078812, Test RMI with client and servers as modules

Hi Stuart, please review the updated webrev, which remove not-suggested filesystem modification and codebase stuff: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xiaofeya/8078812/webrev.02/ Thanks, Felix